The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting.

J. Hagmann, Hendrik Hegemann, Andrew W Neal
{"title":"The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting.","authors":"J. Hagmann, Hendrik Hegemann, Andrew W Neal","doi":"10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While security has always been political, it has for the most part been considered a special kind of politics that closes down political activity and debate. This introduction reviews recent theoretical and empirical developments to argue that a research agenda that re-engages security through the prism of politicisation is better able to elucidate the growing range of actors, arenas and arguments visible in contemporary security governance. Based on recent literatures from Political Science and European Studies that – so far – have been largely ignored by Security Studies, it develops an analytical framework around three dimensions: controversy, mobilisation and arena-shifting. It showcases the relevance of this perspective through brief empirical illustrations on the post-Snowden controversy, public participation on security strategy-making, and the role of parliaments in security policy. The overall aim is to reopen conceptual questions on the relationship between security and politics, inspire innovative empirical work to study the diverse politics around security, and allow for more differentiated normative inquiries into the ambivalent consequences of politicisation.","PeriodicalId":179359,"journal":{"name":"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

While security has always been political, it has for the most part been considered a special kind of politics that closes down political activity and debate. This introduction reviews recent theoretical and empirical developments to argue that a research agenda that re-engages security through the prism of politicisation is better able to elucidate the growing range of actors, arenas and arguments visible in contemporary security governance. Based on recent literatures from Political Science and European Studies that – so far – have been largely ignored by Security Studies, it develops an analytical framework around three dimensions: controversy, mobilisation and arena-shifting. It showcases the relevance of this perspective through brief empirical illustrations on the post-Snowden controversy, public participation on security strategy-making, and the role of parliaments in security policy. The overall aim is to reopen conceptual questions on the relationship between security and politics, inspire innovative empirical work to study the diverse politics around security, and allow for more differentiated normative inquiries into the ambivalent consequences of politicisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全的政治化:争议、动员、舞台转移。
虽然安全一直是政治性的,但它在很大程度上被认为是一种特殊的政治,它关闭了政治活动和辩论。本引言回顾了最近的理论和实证发展,认为通过政治化的棱镜重新参与安全的研究议程能够更好地阐明当代安全治理中可见的越来越多的行动者、领域和论点。基于政治科学和欧洲研究的最新文献——迄今为止——在很大程度上被安全研究所忽视——它围绕三个维度发展了一个分析框架:争议、动员和舞台转移。本书通过对斯诺登事件后的争议、公众参与安全战略制定以及议会在安全政策中的作用的简要实证说明,展示了这一观点的相关性。总体目标是重新审视安全和政治之间关系的概念问题,激发创新的实证工作来研究围绕安全的各种政治,并允许对政治化的矛盾后果进行更有区别的规范调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting. Sacralisation: Defying the Politicisation of Security in Turkey Re-politicising the Gender-Security Nexus: Sweden’s Feminist Foreign Policy Politicising Security at the Boundaries: Privacy in Surveillance and Cybersecurity Politicisation, Law and Rights in the Transnational Counter-Terrorism Space: Indications from the Regulation of Foreign Terrorist Fighters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1