{"title":"Technology Transfer in Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): A Survey","authors":"S. Khanal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3681775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basic concept of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is that both the developed and developing countries benefit from this mechanism. Contributing two objectives; sustainable development to developing countries and emission reduction credit to developed countries, CDM is also expected to contribute to the developing countries’ national development goals. In addition, CDM has potential to support “technological leapfrogging” for the developing countries to bypass the inefficient technological choices, adopted by the developed countries during their industrial period (Philbert, 2004). Hence beyond its primary objectives, CDM is considered as a Technology Transfer (TT) tool to boost technology transfer and diffusion between the developed and developing countries. However, with the increase in the number of CDM projects in developing countries, there are increasing concerns on the geographic distribution of CDM projects (e.g. Nelwamondo 2008, Dechezlepretre et al. 2008) , the benefits between the countries (Ellis et al. 2007), and the perceived lack of technology transfer within the CDM (Nelwamondo 2008). This paper begins with description of the CDM as a TT tool with some contemporary scenarios in present CDM projects and analyses some factors affecting TT among different developing countries. Some issues as sustainability and distributive issues of the CDM projects are also dealt to find whether there are some gaps or limitations in present CDM scenario with respect to the technology transfer. Finally the paper tends to make some conclusions and recommendations for improving the technology performance of the CDM projects.<br><br>This study has used mainly the UNEP Risoe Center CDM Pipeline database and some literatures as the main information sources. Since searching data from the Project Design Documents (PDDs) would be time consuming, and also the required data for the analysis were already synthesized in some literatures as Coninck et al. 2007, Dechezlepretre et al. 2007 and Dechezlepretre et al. 2008; the analyzed data are used for the study of the section – CDM as a technology transfer tool. For the sections – factors affecting technology transfer and emerging concept in CDM, literature review was conducted to arrive to the conclusion.","PeriodicalId":118088,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: International Affairs Issues (Topic)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: International Affairs Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The basic concept of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is that both the developed and developing countries benefit from this mechanism. Contributing two objectives; sustainable development to developing countries and emission reduction credit to developed countries, CDM is also expected to contribute to the developing countries’ national development goals. In addition, CDM has potential to support “technological leapfrogging” for the developing countries to bypass the inefficient technological choices, adopted by the developed countries during their industrial period (Philbert, 2004). Hence beyond its primary objectives, CDM is considered as a Technology Transfer (TT) tool to boost technology transfer and diffusion between the developed and developing countries. However, with the increase in the number of CDM projects in developing countries, there are increasing concerns on the geographic distribution of CDM projects (e.g. Nelwamondo 2008, Dechezlepretre et al. 2008) , the benefits between the countries (Ellis et al. 2007), and the perceived lack of technology transfer within the CDM (Nelwamondo 2008). This paper begins with description of the CDM as a TT tool with some contemporary scenarios in present CDM projects and analyses some factors affecting TT among different developing countries. Some issues as sustainability and distributive issues of the CDM projects are also dealt to find whether there are some gaps or limitations in present CDM scenario with respect to the technology transfer. Finally the paper tends to make some conclusions and recommendations for improving the technology performance of the CDM projects.
This study has used mainly the UNEP Risoe Center CDM Pipeline database and some literatures as the main information sources. Since searching data from the Project Design Documents (PDDs) would be time consuming, and also the required data for the analysis were already synthesized in some literatures as Coninck et al. 2007, Dechezlepretre et al. 2007 and Dechezlepretre et al. 2008; the analyzed data are used for the study of the section – CDM as a technology transfer tool. For the sections – factors affecting technology transfer and emerging concept in CDM, literature review was conducted to arrive to the conclusion.
清洁发展机制(CDM)的基本概念是发达国家和发展中国家都受益于这一机制。贡献两个目标;发展中国家的可持续发展和发达国家的减排信贷,清洁发展机制也有望为发展中国家的国家发展目标做出贡献。此外,清洁发展机制有可能支持发展中国家的“技术跨越式发展”,以绕过发达国家在其工业化时期采用的低效技术选择(Philbert, 2004)。因此,在其主要目标之外,清洁发展机制被视为促进发达国家和发展中国家之间技术转让和扩散的技术转让工具。然而,随着发展中国家清洁发展机制项目数量的增加,人们越来越关注清洁发展机制项目的地理分布(例如,Nelwamondo 2008, Dechezlepretre et al. 2008),国家之间的利益(Ellis et al. 2007),以及清洁发展机制内部缺乏技术转让(Nelwamondo 2008)。本文首先介绍了清洁发展机制作为一种技术转移工具,并结合当前清洁发展机制项目的一些情景,分析了影响不同发展中国家间技术转移的一些因素。还讨论了清洁发展机制项目的可持续性和分配问题等问题,以确定目前的清洁发展机制方案在技术转让方面是否存在一些差距或限制。最后,本文试图对提高CDM项目的技术绩效提出一些结论和建议。本研究主要使用了联合国环境署Risoe中心CDM管道数据库和一些文献作为主要信息来源。由于从项目设计文件(pdd)中检索数据非常耗时,而且分析所需的数据已经在一些文献中得到了综合,如Coninck et al. 2007, Dechezlepretre et al. 2007和Dechezlepretre et al. 2008;所分析的数据将用于分段清洁发展机制作为技术转移工具的研究。对CDM中影响技术转移的因素和新兴概念两部分进行了文献综述,得出结论。