{"title":"The Interaction between Accounting Students- Preference, Teaching Methodology and Performance","authors":"D. Mattar, R. Khoury","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.1058540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined the influence of matching\nstudents- learning preferences with the teaching methodology\nadopted, on their academic performance in an accounting course in\ntwo types of learning environment in one university in Lebanon:\nclasses with PowerPoint (PPT) vs. conventional classes. Learning\npreferences were either for PPT or for Conventional methodology. A\nstatistically significant increase in academic achievement is found in\nthe conventionally instructed group as compared to the group taught\nwith PPT. This low effectiveness of PPT might be attributed to the\nlearning preferences of Lebanese students. In the PPT group, better\nacademic performance was found among students with\nlearning/teaching match as compared with students with\nlearning/teaching mismatch. Since the majority of students display a\npreference for the conventional methodology, the result might\nsuggest that Lebanese students- performance is not optimized by PPT\nin the accounting classrooms, not because of PPT itself, but because\nit is not matching the Lebanese students- learning preferences in such\na quantitative course.","PeriodicalId":224473,"journal":{"name":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1058540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper examined the influence of matching
students- learning preferences with the teaching methodology
adopted, on their academic performance in an accounting course in
two types of learning environment in one university in Lebanon:
classes with PowerPoint (PPT) vs. conventional classes. Learning
preferences were either for PPT or for Conventional methodology. A
statistically significant increase in academic achievement is found in
the conventionally instructed group as compared to the group taught
with PPT. This low effectiveness of PPT might be attributed to the
learning preferences of Lebanese students. In the PPT group, better
academic performance was found among students with
learning/teaching match as compared with students with
learning/teaching mismatch. Since the majority of students display a
preference for the conventional methodology, the result might
suggest that Lebanese students- performance is not optimized by PPT
in the accounting classrooms, not because of PPT itself, but because
it is not matching the Lebanese students- learning preferences in such
a quantitative course.