School-to-School Collaboration: Building Collective Capacity through Collaborative Enquiry

C. Chapman
{"title":"School-to-School Collaboration: Building Collective Capacity through Collaborative Enquiry","authors":"C. Chapman","doi":"10.4135/9781526465542.n32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost half a century ago, Basil Bernstein (1970) argued that schools could not compensate for all the ills of society. While structural inequalities mean that the relationship between poverty and educational attainment remains as steadfast as ever, there is some evidence that offers a more optimistic perspective. Some schools can, and do, make a difference to outcomes for children from high-poverty settings and support the development of more equitable education systems (Sammons, 2007). There is also increasing evidence to suggest that when schools collaborate with and learn from each other then they can have more impact on outcomes than when they work in isolation (Ainscow, 2016). This chapter draws on the experience of the School Improvement Partnership Programme (SIPP), a three-year, school-toschool collaborative initiative. The SIPP is designed to use school-to-school collaboration and collaborative enquiry to build collective capacity to create fairer and higher achieving educational systems. In doing so, the SIPP highlights the importance of evidence and research in giving teachers new and more diverse leadership opportunities, and therefore placing them at the centre of reform efforts. It illuminates the potential for leaders in networks to work collaboratively across schools to address key priorities and highlights the challenge of rethinking roles and responsibilities to enhance professional capital and teacher leadership both within and between schools to enhance collective capacity within the system. Numerous factors interact to determine children’s educational, health and well-being outcomes – and ultimately their life chances. Decades of investment and intervention have delivered some hard-won gains but the correlation between low socio-economic status and restricted life chances remains as seemingly intransigent as ever. Put simply, the odds are stacked against children being able to escape high-poverty settings. 32","PeriodicalId":137214,"journal":{"name":"The SAGE Handbook of School Organization","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The SAGE Handbook of School Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526465542.n32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Almost half a century ago, Basil Bernstein (1970) argued that schools could not compensate for all the ills of society. While structural inequalities mean that the relationship between poverty and educational attainment remains as steadfast as ever, there is some evidence that offers a more optimistic perspective. Some schools can, and do, make a difference to outcomes for children from high-poverty settings and support the development of more equitable education systems (Sammons, 2007). There is also increasing evidence to suggest that when schools collaborate with and learn from each other then they can have more impact on outcomes than when they work in isolation (Ainscow, 2016). This chapter draws on the experience of the School Improvement Partnership Programme (SIPP), a three-year, school-toschool collaborative initiative. The SIPP is designed to use school-to-school collaboration and collaborative enquiry to build collective capacity to create fairer and higher achieving educational systems. In doing so, the SIPP highlights the importance of evidence and research in giving teachers new and more diverse leadership opportunities, and therefore placing them at the centre of reform efforts. It illuminates the potential for leaders in networks to work collaboratively across schools to address key priorities and highlights the challenge of rethinking roles and responsibilities to enhance professional capital and teacher leadership both within and between schools to enhance collective capacity within the system. Numerous factors interact to determine children’s educational, health and well-being outcomes – and ultimately their life chances. Decades of investment and intervention have delivered some hard-won gains but the correlation between low socio-economic status and restricted life chances remains as seemingly intransigent as ever. Put simply, the odds are stacked against children being able to escape high-poverty settings. 32
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校际合作:透过合作探究建立集体能力
近半个世纪前,巴兹尔•伯恩斯坦(Basil Bernstein)(1970)认为,学校无法弥补社会的所有弊病。虽然结构性不平等意味着贫困与受教育程度之间的关系一如既往地牢固,但有一些证据提供了一种更为乐观的观点。一些学校能够,而且确实,对来自高度贫困环境的儿童的结果产生影响,并支持更公平的教育系统的发展(Sammons, 2007)。也有越来越多的证据表明,当学校相互合作和相互学习时,它们可以比单独工作时对结果产生更大的影响(Ainscow, 2016)。本章借鉴了学校改善伙伴计划(SIPP)的经验,这是一项为期三年的学校与学校合作计划。SIPP旨在利用学校与学校之间的合作和合作探究来建立集体能力,以创建更公平和更高成就的教育体系。在此过程中,SIPP强调了证据和研究在为教师提供新的和更多样化的领导机会方面的重要性,从而将他们置于改革努力的中心。它阐明了网络中的领导者在学校之间合作解决关键优先事项的潜力,并强调了重新思考角色和责任的挑战,以增强学校内部和学校之间的专业资本和教师领导力,以增强系统内的集体能力。许多因素相互作用,决定了儿童的教育、健康和福祉结果,并最终决定了他们的生活机会。几十年的投资和干预取得了一些来之不易的成果,但低社会经济地位与有限的生活机会之间的相关性似乎仍然一如既往地顽固。简而言之,孩子们很难摆脱高度贫困的环境。32
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assembling Schools as Organizations: On the Limits and Contradictions of Neoliberalism Inequality in Education: What Educators Can and Cannot Change School-to-School Collaboration: Building Collective Capacity through Collaborative Enquiry Organizational Performance Metrics for Schools Governing and Governance of Schools as Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1