Financial integration in ASEAN+3 bond markets: Evidence in financial crisis

Nurbaizura Borhan, A. Nawawi, Muhammad Azri Mohd
{"title":"Financial integration in ASEAN+3 bond markets: Evidence in financial crisis","authors":"Nurbaizura Borhan, A. Nawawi, Muhammad Azri Mohd","doi":"10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to investigate whether the ASEAN, ASEAN+3 and US markets are integrated or segmented. The countries that are included in the sample are five ASEAN countries comprise Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and Philippines plus Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong and US countries. In this study, the data will be divided into two financial crises which are Asian financial crisis and global financial crisis which each is divided into three sub-periods namely the pre-crisis period, crisis period, and post crisis period. Methods of this study are correlation analysis, unit root test, Johansen's cointegration test and Granger causality test. The findings show that government bond yield markets are more related during post crisis period as compared to pre-crisis period for both Asian financial crisis and global financial crisis. The government bond markets are found to be less cointegrated among themselves. In terms of causality test, it can be argued that global crisis period seems to be more significant causality related as compared to Asian crisis period. There is a possibility that the government bond yield markets are more related in the later years as compared to the earlier years. Further, it can be argued that for markets that are less cointegrated, investors can enjoy long-run international diversification benefits by investing across these markets because they do not have a tendency to move together in the long run.","PeriodicalId":426671,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate whether the ASEAN, ASEAN+3 and US markets are integrated or segmented. The countries that are included in the sample are five ASEAN countries comprise Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and Philippines plus Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong and US countries. In this study, the data will be divided into two financial crises which are Asian financial crisis and global financial crisis which each is divided into three sub-periods namely the pre-crisis period, crisis period, and post crisis period. Methods of this study are correlation analysis, unit root test, Johansen's cointegration test and Granger causality test. The findings show that government bond yield markets are more related during post crisis period as compared to pre-crisis period for both Asian financial crisis and global financial crisis. The government bond markets are found to be less cointegrated among themselves. In terms of causality test, it can be argued that global crisis period seems to be more significant causality related as compared to Asian crisis period. There is a possibility that the government bond yield markets are more related in the later years as compared to the earlier years. Further, it can be argued that for markets that are less cointegrated, investors can enjoy long-run international diversification benefits by investing across these markets because they do not have a tendency to move together in the long run.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东盟+3债券市场的金融一体化:金融危机的证据
本研究的目的是调查东盟、东盟+3和美国市场是一体化的还是细分的。样本中包括五个东盟国家,包括马来西亚、泰国、新加坡、印度尼西亚和菲律宾,以及日本、韩国、中国、台湾、香港和美国。在本研究中,数据将分为两次金融危机,即亚洲金融危机和全球金融危机,每一次都分为三个子时期,即危机前时期,危机时期和危机后时期。本研究采用相关分析、单位根检验、约翰森协整检验和格兰杰因果检验。研究结果表明,无论是亚洲金融危机还是全球金融危机,危机后政府债券收益率市场的相关性都高于危机前。政府债券市场之间的协整性较差。在因果检验方面,可以认为,与亚洲危机时期相比,全球危机时期的因果关系似乎更显著。有一种可能性是,与前几年相比,政府债券收益率市场在后期的相关性更强。此外,可以认为,对于那些协整程度较低的市场,投资者可以通过投资这些市场来享受长期的国际多元化收益,因为它们在长期内没有共同移动的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Islamic inheritance claim processes — Non-normality data traits and best estimator choice Treatment effectiveness of continuous passive motion machine during post-operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament patients Harmonic elimination in switching table-based direct torque control of five-phase PMSM using matrix converter Digital stable IIR high pass filter optimization using PSO-CFIWA IPv6 attack scenarios testbed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1