Co-evolution of complementary formal and informal requirements

A. Krishna, A. Ghose, S. Vilkomir
{"title":"Co-evolution of complementary formal and informal requirements","authors":"A. Krishna, A. Ghose, S. Vilkomir","doi":"10.1109/IWPSE.2004.1334782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agent-oriented Conceptual Modelling (AoCM, as exemplified by the i* notation by E. Yu (1995)), represents an interesting approach to modelling early phase requirements that is particularly effective in capturing organizational contexts, stake-holder intentions and rationale. There are significant benefits in using formal methods for the development of computer systems and improving their quality. We propose a methodology which permits the use of these two otherwise disparate approaches in a complementary and synergistic fashion for requirements engineering.","PeriodicalId":359040,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 7th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, 2004.","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 7th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWPSE.2004.1334782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Agent-oriented Conceptual Modelling (AoCM, as exemplified by the i* notation by E. Yu (1995)), represents an interesting approach to modelling early phase requirements that is particularly effective in capturing organizational contexts, stake-holder intentions and rationale. There are significant benefits in using formal methods for the development of computer systems and improving their quality. We propose a methodology which permits the use of these two otherwise disparate approaches in a complementary and synergistic fashion for requirements engineering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互补的正式和非正式需求的共同演化
面向主体的概念建模(AoCM,如E. Yu(1995)的i*符号所示)代表了一种有趣的方法来建模早期阶段的需求,这种方法在捕获组织背景、涉众意图和基本原理方面特别有效。使用形式化方法开发计算机系统并提高其质量有很大的好处。我们提出了一种方法,它允许在需求工程中以互补和协同的方式使用这两种不同的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aiding comprehension of cloning through categorization Studying the evolution of open source systems at different levels of granularity: two case studies Automating software evolution Foundations for evolutionary construction of state transition models Co-evolution of complementary formal and informal requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1