Ochrona praw mniejszości narodowych w państwach powstałych w zachodniej części byłego Związku Radzieckiego

Grzegorz Bonusiak
{"title":"Ochrona praw mniejszości narodowych w państwach powstałych w zachodniej części byłego Związku Radzieckiego","authors":"Grzegorz Bonusiak","doi":"10.36874/riesw.2022.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to present and compare the level of protection of the rights of national minorities in the states created by the break-up of the Soviet Union, along its former western border. The research covered: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova. In pursuit of the stated aim, the processes occurring in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, which resulted in migrations and significant ethnic mixing of the population, are presented. In the next step, the population of ethnic minorities in the countries covered by the study is presented. It is indicated who each of the countries in question recognises as belonging to minority groups, as well as who Russia, as heir to the former empire, recognises as minorities living in the territories in question. In the final step, the principles of protection of the rights of national minorities in the respective states were analysed. Particular attention was paid to the issue of the freedom to use and teach the language of minority groups. The research showed that the three Baltic States, after regaining their independence, started to rebuild their national identity at the expense of minority rights. However, by doing so, they are now gradually improving their status. The other three states have followed a different path by specifically trying to protect the largest Russian-speaking language group. Growing pressure from Russia seeking to rebuild its imperial position has exposed the flaws in such an arrangement, and Russian-speaking minorities have become a tool of its efforts. As a result, Belarus is on the road to losing its own distinctiveness and reintegrating, Moldova is trying to balance although gradually strengthening its national identity, while Ukraine has abruptly changed its policy since 2014 and is now diligently building its own identity at the expense, however, of minority rights.","PeriodicalId":231114,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36874/riesw.2022.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to present and compare the level of protection of the rights of national minorities in the states created by the break-up of the Soviet Union, along its former western border. The research covered: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova. In pursuit of the stated aim, the processes occurring in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, which resulted in migrations and significant ethnic mixing of the population, are presented. In the next step, the population of ethnic minorities in the countries covered by the study is presented. It is indicated who each of the countries in question recognises as belonging to minority groups, as well as who Russia, as heir to the former empire, recognises as minorities living in the territories in question. In the final step, the principles of protection of the rights of national minorities in the respective states were analysed. Particular attention was paid to the issue of the freedom to use and teach the language of minority groups. The research showed that the three Baltic States, after regaining their independence, started to rebuild their national identity at the expense of minority rights. However, by doing so, they are now gradually improving their status. The other three states have followed a different path by specifically trying to protect the largest Russian-speaking language group. Growing pressure from Russia seeking to rebuild its imperial position has exposed the flaws in such an arrangement, and Russian-speaking minorities have become a tool of its efforts. As a result, Belarus is on the road to losing its own distinctiveness and reintegrating, Moldova is trying to balance although gradually strengthening its national identity, while Ukraine has abruptly changed its policy since 2014 and is now diligently building its own identity at the expense, however, of minority rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这项研究的目的是展示和比较苏联解体后沿其前西部边境建立的国家对少数民族权利的保护水平。研究包括:爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、白俄罗斯、乌克兰和摩尔多瓦。为了实现上述目标,本文介绍了在俄罗斯帝国和苏联发生的导致人口迁移和重大种族混合的进程。在接下来的步骤中,介绍了研究所涵盖的国家的少数民族人口。文中指出,每个有关国家都承认谁属于少数群体,以及俄罗斯作为前帝国的继承人承认谁是生活在有关领土上的少数群体。在最后一步中,分析了各国保护少数民族权利的原则。特别注意了使用和教授少数群体语言的自由问题。研究表明,三个波罗的海国家在重新获得独立后,开始以牺牲少数民族权利为代价重建其民族特性。然而,通过这样做,他们现在正在逐步提高自己的地位。其他三个国家则走了一条不同的道路,特别试图保护最大的俄语群体。来自俄罗斯寻求重建其帝国地位的压力越来越大,暴露了这种安排的缺陷,讲俄语的少数民族已成为其努力的工具。因此,白俄罗斯正走在失去自身独特性并重新融入的道路上,摩尔多瓦虽然在逐步加强其民族认同,但仍在努力保持平衡,而乌克兰自2014年以来突然改变了政策,现在正在努力建立自己的认同,但代价是牺牲少数民族的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Totalitarianism versus humanitarian-personalist concept of socio-political life according to Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński The position of Eastern European countries towards the Three Seas Initiative (TSI) New challenges of international energy security: between continuation and change. Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic Strategic autonomy of the European Union in the politics of France before and after Russian aggression in Ukraine Conflict as a differentiating factor in the creation of social capital among youth in Serbia and Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1