Performance: Differences in measuring performance

Daniel Philipp Schettler
{"title":"Performance: Differences in measuring performance","authors":"Daniel Philipp Schettler","doi":"10.22364/hssl.31.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important issue in human resources is the procedure of the employees’ performance evaluation. The appraisal is essential in the sense of employee appreciation and motivation. Most employers use a subjective performance evaluation of a single superior or a group of persons involved in the employee’s working processes. The subjective evaluation of a group or one person is often questioned about being appropriate. An often-named solution for a more objective criteria could be data driven performance measures. Professional sport provides a unique opportunity to compare objective and subjective performance evaluation measures. A data set of the German Bundesliga was used to test if the two different performance measure come to equal results. It is shown that differences in means exist but equivalence tests support the hypothesis that both measures could be treated as equal. In toto, it seems that in an environment where performance is relatively good to measure objective and subjective performance evaluations lead to equivalent results.","PeriodicalId":120611,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.31.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important issue in human resources is the procedure of the employees’ performance evaluation. The appraisal is essential in the sense of employee appreciation and motivation. Most employers use a subjective performance evaluation of a single superior or a group of persons involved in the employee’s working processes. The subjective evaluation of a group or one person is often questioned about being appropriate. An often-named solution for a more objective criteria could be data driven performance measures. Professional sport provides a unique opportunity to compare objective and subjective performance evaluation measures. A data set of the German Bundesliga was used to test if the two different performance measure come to equal results. It is shown that differences in means exist but equivalence tests support the hypothesis that both measures could be treated as equal. In toto, it seems that in an environment where performance is relatively good to measure objective and subjective performance evaluations lead to equivalent results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绩效:衡量绩效的差异
人力资源中的一个重要问题是员工绩效评估的程序。在员工欣赏和激励的意义上,评估是必不可少的。大多数雇主对参与员工工作流程的单个上级或一组人员进行主观绩效评估。对一个群体或一个人的主观评价常常被质疑是否恰当。对于更客观的标准,一个经常被命名的解决方案可能是数据驱动的性能度量。职业运动提供了一个独特的机会来比较客观和主观的表现评估措施。一组来自德甲联赛的数据被用来测试这两种不同的表现指标是否能得出相同的结果。结果表明,均值存在差异,但等效检验支持两种测量方法可以被视为相等的假设。综上所述,在一个绩效相对较好的环境中,客观和主观的绩效评估似乎会导致相同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance: Differences in measuring performance Reflections on Green Spaces and Urban Leadership from Riga Ideology in the Development of Latvian Co-operatives from the 19th Century to 1934 Correlate of foreign direct investment and economic development evidence from Nigeria Fighting or encouraging, but not ignoring – different attitudes towards migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1