Effective Design Team Composition Using Individual and Group Cognitive Attributes

Kaitlyn N. Fritz, Line Deschenes, Vijitashwa Pandey
{"title":"Effective Design Team Composition Using Individual and Group Cognitive Attributes","authors":"Kaitlyn N. Fritz, Line Deschenes, Vijitashwa Pandey","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-86888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering design is typically a team effort. Design teams frequently need to push technical boundaries to solve the most relevant challenges faced by our society. A significant area of research across multiple fields of investigation, including engineering, is the understanding and use of an individual’s cognitive attributes in the process of assembling productive teams. This research proposes an approach to assembling an engineering design team by first defining the desirable cognitive attributes in the team members. Subsequently, based on individual cognitive profile assessments along these attributes, an exhaustive list of possible design teams is investigated based on their cumulative attribute level. We compare the performance of two teams predicted to perform at different levels, and our results verify the differences between the observations of team interactions and the quality of designs produced. In addition to self-assessments, we also investigate the brain activity of the respondents using electroencephalography (EEG) to evaluate performance in an individual and a team setting. This analysis intends to highlight the characteristics of an individuals’ brain activity under different circumstances to reveal if these characteristics contribute to the success of a design team. EEG data revealed observations such as correlation between raw amplitude and level of team contribution, a higher variation in the channel power spectral density during individual versus team tasks, and a degradation of alpha activity moving from individual to group work. The results of this research can guide organizations to form teams with the necessary cognitive attributes to achieve the optimum design solution.","PeriodicalId":201128,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-86888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Engineering design is typically a team effort. Design teams frequently need to push technical boundaries to solve the most relevant challenges faced by our society. A significant area of research across multiple fields of investigation, including engineering, is the understanding and use of an individual’s cognitive attributes in the process of assembling productive teams. This research proposes an approach to assembling an engineering design team by first defining the desirable cognitive attributes in the team members. Subsequently, based on individual cognitive profile assessments along these attributes, an exhaustive list of possible design teams is investigated based on their cumulative attribute level. We compare the performance of two teams predicted to perform at different levels, and our results verify the differences between the observations of team interactions and the quality of designs produced. In addition to self-assessments, we also investigate the brain activity of the respondents using electroencephalography (EEG) to evaluate performance in an individual and a team setting. This analysis intends to highlight the characteristics of an individuals’ brain activity under different circumstances to reveal if these characteristics contribute to the success of a design team. EEG data revealed observations such as correlation between raw amplitude and level of team contribution, a higher variation in the channel power spectral density during individual versus team tasks, and a degradation of alpha activity moving from individual to group work. The results of this research can guide organizations to form teams with the necessary cognitive attributes to achieve the optimum design solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用个人和群体认知属性的有效设计团队组成
工程设计通常是一个团队的工作。设计团队经常需要突破技术界限来解决我们社会面临的最相关的挑战。包括工程在内的多个调查领域的一个重要研究领域是在组建高效团队的过程中理解和使用个人的认知属性。本研究提出了一种通过定义团队成员的理想认知属性来组建工程设计团队的方法。随后,基于对这些属性的个人认知概况评估,根据其累积属性级别调查可能的设计团队的详尽列表。我们比较了两个团队在不同水平上的表现,我们的结果验证了团队互动和设计质量之间的差异。除了自我评估,我们还使用脑电图(EEG)来调查受访者的大脑活动,以评估个人和团队环境中的表现。这一分析旨在突出个人在不同环境下的大脑活动特征,以揭示这些特征是否有助于设计团队的成功。脑电图数据揭示了原始振幅和团队贡献水平之间的相关性,在个人任务和团队任务期间通道功率谱密度的更高变化,以及从个人工作到团队工作的α活动的退化。本研究的结果可以指导组织组建具有必要认知属性的团队,以实现最优设计方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engineering a Pool Ladder to Prevent Drownings in Above-Ground Pools Side Structure Integrity Research for Passenger Rail Equipment A Set of Preliminary Model Experiments for Studying Engineering Student Biases in the Assessment and Prioritization of Risks Uncertainty Optimization Design of Vehicle Wheel Made of Long Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Limit Load Analysis of As-Fabricated Pipe Bends With Low Ovality Under In-Plane Closing Moment Loading and Internal Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1