Formal property verification by abstraction refinement with formal, simulation and hybrid engines

Dong Wang, Pei-Hsin Ho, Jiang Long, J. Kukula, Yunshan Zhu, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, R. Damiano
{"title":"Formal property verification by abstraction refinement with formal, simulation and hybrid engines","authors":"Dong Wang, Pei-Hsin Ho, Jiang Long, J. Kukula, Yunshan Zhu, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, R. Damiano","doi":"10.1145/378239.378260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present RFN, a formal property verification tool based on abstraction refinement. Abstraction refinement is a strategy for property verification. It iteratively refines an abstract model to better approximate the behavior of the original design in the hope that the abstract model alone will provide enough evidence to prove or disprove the property. However, previous work on abstraction refinement was only demonstrated on designs with up to 500 registers. We developed RFN to verify real-world designs that may contain thousands of registers. RFN differs from the previous work in several ways. First, instead of relying on a single engine, RFN employs multiple formal verification engines, including a BDD-ATPG hybrid engine and a conventional BDD-based fixpoint engine, for finding error traces or proving properties on the abstract model. Second, RFN uses a novel two-phase process involving 3-valued simulation and sequential ATPG to determine how to refine the abstract model. Third, RFN avoids the weakness of other abstraction-refinement algorithms-finding error traces on the original design, by utilizing the error trace of the abstract model to guide sequential ATPG to find an error trace on the original design. We implemented and applied a prototype of RFN to verify various properties of real-world RTL designs containing approximately 5,000 registers, which represents an order of magnitude improvement over previous results. On these designs, we successfully proved a few properties and discovered a design violation.","PeriodicalId":154316,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37232)","volume":"421 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37232)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/378239.378260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

We present RFN, a formal property verification tool based on abstraction refinement. Abstraction refinement is a strategy for property verification. It iteratively refines an abstract model to better approximate the behavior of the original design in the hope that the abstract model alone will provide enough evidence to prove or disprove the property. However, previous work on abstraction refinement was only demonstrated on designs with up to 500 registers. We developed RFN to verify real-world designs that may contain thousands of registers. RFN differs from the previous work in several ways. First, instead of relying on a single engine, RFN employs multiple formal verification engines, including a BDD-ATPG hybrid engine and a conventional BDD-based fixpoint engine, for finding error traces or proving properties on the abstract model. Second, RFN uses a novel two-phase process involving 3-valued simulation and sequential ATPG to determine how to refine the abstract model. Third, RFN avoids the weakness of other abstraction-refinement algorithms-finding error traces on the original design, by utilizing the error trace of the abstract model to guide sequential ATPG to find an error trace on the original design. We implemented and applied a prototype of RFN to verify various properties of real-world RTL designs containing approximately 5,000 registers, which represents an order of magnitude improvement over previous results. On these designs, we successfully proved a few properties and discovered a design violation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过形式化、仿真和混合引擎进行抽象细化的形式化属性验证
提出了一种基于抽象细化的形式化属性验证工具RFN。抽象细化是一种属性验证策略。它迭代地改进抽象模型,以更好地近似原始设计的行为,希望抽象模型本身就能提供足够的证据来证明或反驳该属性。然而,之前关于抽象细化的工作只在多达500个寄存器的设计上得到了演示。我们开发RFN是为了验证可能包含数千个寄存器的实际设计。RFN在几个方面不同于以前的工作。首先,RFN不依赖单一引擎,而是使用多个形式验证引擎,包括BDD-ATPG混合引擎和传统的基于bdd的定点引擎,用于查找错误痕迹或证明抽象模型上的属性。其次,RFN采用一种新颖的两阶段过程,包括3值模拟和顺序ATPG,以确定如何改进抽象模型。第三,RFN通过利用抽象模型的错误跟踪引导序列ATPG在原始设计上寻找错误跟踪,避免了其他抽象细化算法在原始设计上寻找错误跟踪的弱点。我们实现并应用了RFN的原型来验证包含大约5,000个寄存器的真实RTL设计的各种特性,这比以前的结果有了一个数量级的改进。在这些设计中,我们成功地证明了一些属性,并发现了设计违规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
False coupling interactions in static timing analysis Scalable hybrid verification of complex microprocessors System-level power/performance analysis for embedded systems design Automated pipeline design Test strategies for BIST at the algorithmic and register-transfer levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1