New Hybrid MCDM Approach for an Optimal Selection of Maintenance Strategies: Results of a Case Study

N. E. H. Khanfri, N. Ouazraoui, A. Simohammed, I. Sellami
{"title":"New Hybrid MCDM Approach for an Optimal Selection of Maintenance Strategies: Results of a Case Study","authors":"N. E. H. Khanfri, N. Ouazraoui, A. Simohammed, I. Sellami","doi":"10.2118/215846-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Industrial systems are becoming more sophisticated, and their failure can result in significant losses for the company in terms of production loss, maintenance costs, fines, image loss, etc. Conventional approaches to modeling and evaluating the failure mechanisms of these systems do not consider certain important aspects, such as the interdependencies between failure modes (FMs) with information and data containing uncertainties as they are generally collected from experts’ judgments. These restrictions may lead to improper decision-making. The use of more advanced techniques to model and assess the interdependencies among components’ failures under uncertainties seems to be more than necessary to overcome these deficiencies.\n It is in this context that the proposed approach fits. It consists of proposing a hybrid multicriteria decision-aking (MCDM) approach that combines several techniques for a better selection of maintenance strategies. Using the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) technique, the potential FMs of components, along with their causes and effects, are identified. The relative importance (or weight) of these FMs is determined using the fuzzy simple additive weighing (FSAW) method based on how they affect the system’s goals. The causal relationships between FMs and their final weights are determined by the fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) method and the nonlinear Hebbian learning and differential evolution (NHL-DE) algorithm. Finally, based on the final FM weights provided by the FCM, the simple additive weighing (SAW) method is used to select the optimal maintenance strategies. The results of applying the proposed approach to an operating compressor lubrication and sealing oil system demonstrate its importance and usefulness in assisting system operators to efficiently allocate the optimal maintenance strategies, considering the strong correlation between FMs and their effects on system performance while accounting for the uncertainties associated with experts’ judgments. These correlation effects have led to changes in the assigned weights of the selected FMs. Specifically, the FM related to the low output of the lube/seal oil pump, which was initially assigned a lower priority, and with the correlation effects has become the first critical FM. This shift in prioritization emphasizes the need to address this particular FM promptly. By focusing on addressing these high-priority FMs, maintenance efforts can be optimized to prevent or mitigate more severe consequences. Among the various maintenance strategies evaluated, it was determined that the combination of condition-based maintenance (CBM) and precision maintenance (PrM) yields the most favorable outcome in terms of mitigating the impact of accidental failures and undesired events on the selected system.","PeriodicalId":153181,"journal":{"name":"SPE Production & Operations","volume":"648 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Production & Operations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/215846-pa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industrial systems are becoming more sophisticated, and their failure can result in significant losses for the company in terms of production loss, maintenance costs, fines, image loss, etc. Conventional approaches to modeling and evaluating the failure mechanisms of these systems do not consider certain important aspects, such as the interdependencies between failure modes (FMs) with information and data containing uncertainties as they are generally collected from experts’ judgments. These restrictions may lead to improper decision-making. The use of more advanced techniques to model and assess the interdependencies among components’ failures under uncertainties seems to be more than necessary to overcome these deficiencies. It is in this context that the proposed approach fits. It consists of proposing a hybrid multicriteria decision-aking (MCDM) approach that combines several techniques for a better selection of maintenance strategies. Using the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) technique, the potential FMs of components, along with their causes and effects, are identified. The relative importance (or weight) of these FMs is determined using the fuzzy simple additive weighing (FSAW) method based on how they affect the system’s goals. The causal relationships between FMs and their final weights are determined by the fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) method and the nonlinear Hebbian learning and differential evolution (NHL-DE) algorithm. Finally, based on the final FM weights provided by the FCM, the simple additive weighing (SAW) method is used to select the optimal maintenance strategies. The results of applying the proposed approach to an operating compressor lubrication and sealing oil system demonstrate its importance and usefulness in assisting system operators to efficiently allocate the optimal maintenance strategies, considering the strong correlation between FMs and their effects on system performance while accounting for the uncertainties associated with experts’ judgments. These correlation effects have led to changes in the assigned weights of the selected FMs. Specifically, the FM related to the low output of the lube/seal oil pump, which was initially assigned a lower priority, and with the correlation effects has become the first critical FM. This shift in prioritization emphasizes the need to address this particular FM promptly. By focusing on addressing these high-priority FMs, maintenance efforts can be optimized to prevent or mitigate more severe consequences. Among the various maintenance strategies evaluated, it was determined that the combination of condition-based maintenance (CBM) and precision maintenance (PrM) yields the most favorable outcome in terms of mitigating the impact of accidental failures and undesired events on the selected system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的混合MCDM方法用于维修策略的最优选择:案例研究的结果
工业系统正变得越来越复杂,它们的故障可能会给公司带来重大损失,包括生产损失、维护成本、罚款、形象损失等。对这些系统的失效机制进行建模和评估的传统方法没有考虑某些重要方面,例如失效模式(FMs)之间的相互依赖关系,这些信息和数据通常是从专家的判断中收集的,其中包含不确定性。这些限制可能导致决策不当。使用更先进的技术来建模和评估不确定情况下组件故障之间的相互依赖性似乎是克服这些缺陷的必要条件。拟议的办法正是适合于这种情况。它包括提出一种混合多标准决策(MCDM)方法,该方法结合了几种技术来更好地选择维护策略。利用失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)技术,确定了部件的潜在失效模式及其原因和影响。这些FMs的相对重要性(或权重)是根据它们对系统目标的影响程度使用模糊简单加性加权(FSAW)方法确定的。采用模糊认知映射(FCM)方法和非线性Hebbian学习与差分进化(NHL-DE)算法确定了FMs与最终权重之间的因果关系。最后,基于FCM提供的最终FM权重,采用简单加法加权(SAW)方法选择最优维修策略。将该方法应用于运行中的压缩机润滑和密封油系统的结果表明,考虑到FMs及其对系统性能的影响之间的强相关性,同时考虑到与专家判断相关的不确定性,该方法在帮助系统操作员有效分配最佳维护策略方面具有重要性和实用性。这些相关效应导致了所选FMs分配权重的变化。其中,与润滑油/密封油泵产量低相关的调频,最初被分配的优先级较低,但随着相关效应的增加,已成为第一关键调频。这种优先次序的转变强调了迅速解决这一特定FM的必要性。通过专注于解决这些高优先级fm,维护工作可以优化,以防止或减轻更严重的后果。在评估的各种维护策略中,确定了基于状态的维护(CBM)和精确维护(PrM)的组合在减轻意外故障和不期望事件对所选系统的影响方面产生最有利的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production Profiles Recorded Using Fiber-Optic Technology in Wells with Electrical Submersible Pump Lift System Development of Methods for Top-Down Methane Emission Measurements of Oil and Gas Facilities in an Offshore Environment Using a Miniature Methane Spectrometer and Long-Endurance Uncrewed Aerial System New Hybrid MCDM Approach for an Optimal Selection of Maintenance Strategies: Results of a Case Study Study on the Synthesis and Properties of a New Salt-Resistant Drag Reducer Challenges and Practices for Recovering Stuck Coiled Tubing Pipe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1