Communicating biodiversity loss and its link to economics

G. Mace
{"title":"Communicating biodiversity loss and its link to economics","authors":"G. Mace","doi":"10.4337/9781800371781.00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change and biodiversity loss are the two most important features of human-driven global environmental change. They are also closely related. Not only are they both direct consequences of human population growth, natural resource consumption and waste, but there are many interrelationships among the actions that will be necessary to address each of them. However, while biodiversity loss attracts a great deal of popular interest, it has not achieved the same degree of political attention as climate change. Biodiversity lacks effective intergovernmental commitments, something that biodiversity scientists regularly lament (Legagneux et al., 2018). Perhaps this is because the causes of biodiversity loss are complex and less clear-cut than are the causes of climate change. While it is clear that moving away from our current carbon-based economy will be difficult, it is much more tangible than the multiple actions across scales and sectors that will be required to reverse biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). At least we know what we must do to limit the degree of climate change. But the lack of binding commitments addressing biodiversity loss may also be due to the fact that the immediate consequences of biodiversity loss are neither evident nor obviously material compared to climate change impacts. It is accepted that climate change carries substantial economic costs, and even existential threats. By contrast, the consequences of biodiversity loss are multiple, vague and often contested. While there are very good reasons to be concerned about biodiversity loss and its potential to pose a serious risk to future generations, biodiversity can be perceived as an idle concern for amateur naturalists, or a manageable problem that technological innovation will address as necessary. The recognition of ecosystem services and their importance for society (Daily, 1997) has to some extent transformed the way in which biodiversity is perceived in policy-making. A developing narrative about the dependence of people on nature, and assessments such as those produced by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA, 2005), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB, 2010), and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES,","PeriodicalId":256332,"journal":{"name":"Standing up for a Sustainable World","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Standing up for a Sustainable World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371781.00073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change and biodiversity loss are the two most important features of human-driven global environmental change. They are also closely related. Not only are they both direct consequences of human population growth, natural resource consumption and waste, but there are many interrelationships among the actions that will be necessary to address each of them. However, while biodiversity loss attracts a great deal of popular interest, it has not achieved the same degree of political attention as climate change. Biodiversity lacks effective intergovernmental commitments, something that biodiversity scientists regularly lament (Legagneux et al., 2018). Perhaps this is because the causes of biodiversity loss are complex and less clear-cut than are the causes of climate change. While it is clear that moving away from our current carbon-based economy will be difficult, it is much more tangible than the multiple actions across scales and sectors that will be required to reverse biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). At least we know what we must do to limit the degree of climate change. But the lack of binding commitments addressing biodiversity loss may also be due to the fact that the immediate consequences of biodiversity loss are neither evident nor obviously material compared to climate change impacts. It is accepted that climate change carries substantial economic costs, and even existential threats. By contrast, the consequences of biodiversity loss are multiple, vague and often contested. While there are very good reasons to be concerned about biodiversity loss and its potential to pose a serious risk to future generations, biodiversity can be perceived as an idle concern for amateur naturalists, or a manageable problem that technological innovation will address as necessary. The recognition of ecosystem services and their importance for society (Daily, 1997) has to some extent transformed the way in which biodiversity is perceived in policy-making. A developing narrative about the dependence of people on nature, and assessments such as those produced by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA, 2005), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB, 2010), and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宣传生物多样性丧失及其与经济的联系
气候变化和生物多样性丧失是人类驱动的全球环境变化的两个最重要特征。它们也是密切相关的。它们不仅都是人口增长、自然资源消耗和浪费的直接后果,而且解决每一个问题所必需的行动之间也有许多相互关系。然而,尽管生物多样性的丧失引起了大众的极大兴趣,但它并没有像气候变化那样得到同等程度的政治关注。生物多样性缺乏有效的政府间承诺,这是生物多样性科学家经常哀叹的(Legagneux et al., 2018)。也许这是因为生物多样性丧失的原因比气候变化的原因更复杂,更不明确。虽然很明显,摆脱目前的碳基经济将是困难的,但这比扭转生物多样性丧失所需的跨规模和部门的多重行动要切实得多(IPBES, 2019)。至少我们知道我们必须做些什么来限制气候变化的程度。但是,缺乏解决生物多样性丧失问题的约束性承诺也可能是由于与气候变化影响相比,生物多样性丧失的直接后果既不明显也不明显。人们普遍认为,气候变化会带来巨大的经济成本,甚至是生存威胁。相比之下,生物多样性丧失的后果是多重的、模糊的,而且往往存在争议。虽然有很好的理由担心生物多样性的丧失及其对后代构成严重威胁的可能性,但生物多样性可以被认为是业余博物学家的无聊担忧,或者是技术创新将在必要时解决的可控问题。对生态系统服务及其对社会的重要性的认识(Daily, 1997)在某种程度上改变了政策制定中对生物多样性的看法。关于人对自然依赖的发展叙述,以及千年生态系统评估(MEA, 2005年)、生态系统和生物多样性经济学(TEEB, 2010年)和生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台(IPBES)所做的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capitalism and the curse of external effects The Paris Agreement on climate change: what legacy? Communicating biodiversity loss and its link to economics Introduction to Part V Unleashing the power of financial markets for the green transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1