A STUDY ON ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ENGLISH – VIETNAMESE CONSECUTIVE INTERPRETING TESTS

Tran Phuong Linh, Do Minh Hoang
{"title":"A STUDY ON ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ENGLISH – VIETNAMESE CONSECUTIVE INTERPRETING TESTS","authors":"Tran Phuong Linh, Do Minh Hoang","doi":"10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigates the reliability and user feedback about the rubrics to evaluate English – Vietnamese consecutive interpreting tests taken by undergraduates at VNU-ULIS created by Tran and Do (2022). Five VNU-ULIS raters – two experienced raters and three novice ones – independently rated ten different interpreting tests and provided their feedback on the rubrics. The results reveal the newly created rubrics is mostly considered user-friendly and practical application for interpreting evaluation. Overall, inter-rater reliability, which was presented through Cronbach’s alpha and the single measure intra-class coefficient, was acceptable. Besides, the value among the novice raters was higher than that between the two experienced ones. The raters’ perception of each quality criterion and their rating process may account for the differences in their score decisions. The findings also suggest further improvements in terms of descriptor wording, weightings and rater training.","PeriodicalId":249991,"journal":{"name":"VNU Journal of Foreign Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VNU Journal of Foreign Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates the reliability and user feedback about the rubrics to evaluate English – Vietnamese consecutive interpreting tests taken by undergraduates at VNU-ULIS created by Tran and Do (2022). Five VNU-ULIS raters – two experienced raters and three novice ones – independently rated ten different interpreting tests and provided their feedback on the rubrics. The results reveal the newly created rubrics is mostly considered user-friendly and practical application for interpreting evaluation. Overall, inter-rater reliability, which was presented through Cronbach’s alpha and the single measure intra-class coefficient, was acceptable. Besides, the value among the novice raters was higher than that between the two experienced ones. The raters’ perception of each quality criterion and their rating process may account for the differences in their score decisions. The findings also suggest further improvements in terms of descriptor wording, weightings and rater training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英越交替传译考试评价标准研究
本研究调查了由Tran和Do(2022)创建的越南国立大学-国立外语学院本科生英语-越南语交替传译测试评估标准的可靠性和用户反馈。五名VNU-ULIS评分员——两名经验丰富的评分员和三名新手——独立地对十个不同的口译测试进行评分,并就标准提供反馈。结果表明,该标准在口译评价中具有较好的易用性和实用性。总体而言,通过Cronbach 's alpha和单一测量等级内系数表示的等级间信度是可以接受的。此外,新手评价者之间的价值高于两名经验者之间。评分者对每个质量标准的感知和他们的评分过程可能会解释他们评分决策的差异。研究结果还表明,在描述词的措辞、权重和评分训练方面,还需要进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HỌC TIẾNG ANH DI ĐỘNG: THANH THIẾU NIÊN VIỆT NAM ĐÃ TỰ CHỦ HỌC CHƯA? Vocabulary Matrix: Understanding, Learning, Teaching, Michael McCarthy, Anne O'Keeffe & Steven Walsh (Eds.) INTERPRETING MOET’S 2018 GENERAL EDUCATION ENGLISH CURRICULUM EMI FOR ENGINEERING-TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS IN VIETNAM: CHALLENGES & SUGGESTIONS DIFFICULTIES IN LEGAL ENGLISH READING COMPREHENSION TO ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS AT HANOI LAW UNIVERSITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1