RUSSIA AND UKRAINE: CURRENT PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE NEW NORMALITY

A. Tymoshchuk
{"title":"RUSSIA AND UKRAINE: CURRENT PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE NEW NORMALITY","authors":"A. Tymoshchuk","doi":"10.35634/2587-9030-2021-5-4-460-468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intellectual challenges of modern political relations of the socio-technical structure are caused by a number of the most diverse factors: 1) the collapse of classical epistemology, based on the principles of linear causation, cognizability; 2) the speed of socio-technical changes and agile nature of environment; 3) the postcolonial nature of communication and advancement of knowledge; 4) the fragility of social order. The very awareness of the environment in which we find ourselves is already a problem and has given rise to many concepts such as synergy, nonstationarity, VUCA, new normality, Janus-likeness. The relevance of the topic is associated with the dialectics of the complexity of the development of civilization, threats to sustainable development. The complexity, multifactorial nature, and instability of the global socio-technical reality do not contribute to adaptation to a special state of the environment, which cannot be unambiguously defined as order (space) or chaos. The article suggests that we must plan for the sustainable development of mankind and move on to the policy of new pragmatism. Thus, in the conditions of the new normality, a new paraconsistent political thinking is required in Russian-Ukrainian relations. All parties to the conflict lack reflexivity, and on the ideological plane, they are fighting a fictitious image of the enemy. Old ideologemes such as “Russian aggression” or “Bandera’s” are not productive in describing the Other. We need a new pragmatism based on territorial proximity, economics and logistics. The author proceeds from the deontic modality, believing that Russia and Ukraine do not sufficiently use the resource of reflexivity in a complex political game. Non-classical society and the complexity of processes and social systems do not allow successfully implementing a linear management model for complex political and economic processes. The reflexive approach allows one to adequately study the metastable states of the counterparty, relying on the context of its values. Ukraine, like any frontier culture, is an amalgam that arose at the junction of the Polish, Russian, Lithuanian, Turkish, and Jewish worlds. The correct construction of a supra-ethnic multilingual nation is the secret of Ukraine's success. This solution is very modern, since the global trend is pluralism and multipolarity.","PeriodicalId":263017,"journal":{"name":"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2021-5-4-460-468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intellectual challenges of modern political relations of the socio-technical structure are caused by a number of the most diverse factors: 1) the collapse of classical epistemology, based on the principles of linear causation, cognizability; 2) the speed of socio-technical changes and agile nature of environment; 3) the postcolonial nature of communication and advancement of knowledge; 4) the fragility of social order. The very awareness of the environment in which we find ourselves is already a problem and has given rise to many concepts such as synergy, nonstationarity, VUCA, new normality, Janus-likeness. The relevance of the topic is associated with the dialectics of the complexity of the development of civilization, threats to sustainable development. The complexity, multifactorial nature, and instability of the global socio-technical reality do not contribute to adaptation to a special state of the environment, which cannot be unambiguously defined as order (space) or chaos. The article suggests that we must plan for the sustainable development of mankind and move on to the policy of new pragmatism. Thus, in the conditions of the new normality, a new paraconsistent political thinking is required in Russian-Ukrainian relations. All parties to the conflict lack reflexivity, and on the ideological plane, they are fighting a fictitious image of the enemy. Old ideologemes such as “Russian aggression” or “Bandera’s” are not productive in describing the Other. We need a new pragmatism based on territorial proximity, economics and logistics. The author proceeds from the deontic modality, believing that Russia and Ukraine do not sufficiently use the resource of reflexivity in a complex political game. Non-classical society and the complexity of processes and social systems do not allow successfully implementing a linear management model for complex political and economic processes. The reflexive approach allows one to adequately study the metastable states of the counterparty, relying on the context of its values. Ukraine, like any frontier culture, is an amalgam that arose at the junction of the Polish, Russian, Lithuanian, Turkish, and Jewish worlds. The correct construction of a supra-ethnic multilingual nation is the secret of Ukraine's success. This solution is very modern, since the global trend is pluralism and multipolarity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯和乌克兰:新常态条件下国际关系的当前问题
社会技术结构的现代政治关系的智力挑战是由许多最多样化的因素引起的:1)基于线性因果关系、可认知性原则的经典认识论的崩溃;2)社会技术变化的速度和环境的敏捷性;3)传播和知识进步的后殖民性质;4)社会秩序的脆弱。对我们所处环境的认识本身已经是一个问题,并产生了许多概念,如协同作用、非静止性、VUCA、新常态、两面相似。主题的相关性与文明发展的复杂性、对可持续发展的威胁等辩证法有关。全球社会技术现实的复杂性、多因素性和不稳定性无助于适应环境的特殊状态,这种状态不能明确地定义为秩序(空间)或混乱。文章提出,我们必须为人类的可持续发展作出规划,实行新实用主义政策。因此,在新常态的条件下,俄乌关系需要一种新的非一致性政治思维。冲突各方都缺乏反身性,在意识形态层面上,他们是在与一个虚构的敌人形象作战。旧的意识形态,如“俄罗斯侵略”或“班德拉的”,在描述他者时是无效的。我们需要一种基于领土邻近、经济和物流的新实用主义。作者从道义情态出发,认为俄罗斯和乌克兰在复杂的政治博弈中没有充分利用反身性资源。非古典社会和过程和社会系统的复杂性不允许成功地实施复杂的政治和经济过程的线性管理模式。反身性方法允许人们充分研究对手的亚稳态,依赖于其价值观的背景。乌克兰,像任何边境文化一样,是波兰、俄罗斯、立陶宛、土耳其和犹太世界的交汇处产生的混合体。正确建设超民族多语言国家是乌克兰成功的秘诀。这个解决方案非常现代,因为全球趋势是多元化和多极化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FEATURES OF LATIN AMERICAN SOCIALISM ON THE EXAMPLE OF CHILE, BOLIVIA, VENEZUELA AND NICARAGUA SOCIAL ASPECTS OF MANAGING RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OF NEURAL NETWORKS THE HISTORY OF ISLAM IN THE POLITICS OF MEMORY IN INDONESIA (mid-2010s to early 2020s) "MYSTERIOUS ALBION": NEGOTIATION BEHAVIOR PATTERN OF THE BRITISH SPECIFICS OF THE RUSSIAN COGNITARIATE OF GENERATION Z
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1