Percutaneous cannulated cancellous screw fixation v/s open reduction and internal fixation with plating for intra-articular calcaneal fractures

Dr. Paresh V Patil, Dr. Mithilesh A Nikam, Dr. P. Senthil Kumar
{"title":"Percutaneous cannulated cancellous screw fixation v/s open reduction and internal fixation with plating for intra-articular calcaneal fractures","authors":"Dr. Paresh V Patil, Dr. Mithilesh A Nikam, Dr. P. Senthil Kumar","doi":"10.33545/orthor.2021.v5.i4b.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The calcaneus is the largest tarsal bone and the most commonly fractured. Calcaneal fractures account for about 2% of all fractures, with 75 percent of these being intra-articular. Anatomic restoration in intra-articular calcaneal fractures was not always associated with a positive outcome in terms of quality of life, hence the best treatment option is still up for debate. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is considered an exemplary modality for treating calcaneal fractures. Soft tissue complications after ORIF procedures, on the other hand, have been reported to be as high as 30%. Scholars have advocated external fixation, percutaneous cannulated cancellous screw fixation, and Schanz pin assisted reduction and fixation as minimally invasive methods to reduce postoperative problems. In the present study, we aim to study the outcome of intra-articular calcaneum fractures treated with percutaneous cannulated cancellous screws V/S open reduction internal fixation with calcaneum plates. Materials and Methods: 22 patients with intra-articular calcaneum fracture (with displacement > 2mm) were recruited for the study after taking informed written consent. Patients were divided randomly into 2 groups; Group A were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous cannulated cancellous (CC) screw fixation. While patients in Group B were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plating. The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad during the period of May-2020 to May-2021. Pre-operative and post-operative Bohler’s angles were calculated using PACS, functional outcome was assessed at 6 months post-operatively using AOFAS score and post operative pain was assessed using VAS score. Results: The present study indicated no significant difference in the post-operative maintenance of Bohler’s angle when operated by either of the techniques. But, functional outcome in terms of AOFAS score when assessed at the end of 6 months indicated an excellent and good outcome in patients operated with cannulated cancellous screws as compared to patients operated with ORIF with calcaneum plating. Post operative complications were reported significantly high in group of patients operated with ORIF with plating as compared to percutaneous CC screw group patients. Conclusion: Percutaneous minimally invasive fixation using cannulated cancellous screws are better choice than ORIF with calcaneum plating due to lesser post operative pain and soft tissue complications, better functional outcome in terms of AOFAS score and lesser implant related soft tissue complications.","PeriodicalId":151163,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/orthor.2021.v5.i4b.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The calcaneus is the largest tarsal bone and the most commonly fractured. Calcaneal fractures account for about 2% of all fractures, with 75 percent of these being intra-articular. Anatomic restoration in intra-articular calcaneal fractures was not always associated with a positive outcome in terms of quality of life, hence the best treatment option is still up for debate. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is considered an exemplary modality for treating calcaneal fractures. Soft tissue complications after ORIF procedures, on the other hand, have been reported to be as high as 30%. Scholars have advocated external fixation, percutaneous cannulated cancellous screw fixation, and Schanz pin assisted reduction and fixation as minimally invasive methods to reduce postoperative problems. In the present study, we aim to study the outcome of intra-articular calcaneum fractures treated with percutaneous cannulated cancellous screws V/S open reduction internal fixation with calcaneum plates. Materials and Methods: 22 patients with intra-articular calcaneum fracture (with displacement > 2mm) were recruited for the study after taking informed written consent. Patients were divided randomly into 2 groups; Group A were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous cannulated cancellous (CC) screw fixation. While patients in Group B were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plating. The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad during the period of May-2020 to May-2021. Pre-operative and post-operative Bohler’s angles were calculated using PACS, functional outcome was assessed at 6 months post-operatively using AOFAS score and post operative pain was assessed using VAS score. Results: The present study indicated no significant difference in the post-operative maintenance of Bohler’s angle when operated by either of the techniques. But, functional outcome in terms of AOFAS score when assessed at the end of 6 months indicated an excellent and good outcome in patients operated with cannulated cancellous screws as compared to patients operated with ORIF with calcaneum plating. Post operative complications were reported significantly high in group of patients operated with ORIF with plating as compared to percutaneous CC screw group patients. Conclusion: Percutaneous minimally invasive fixation using cannulated cancellous screws are better choice than ORIF with calcaneum plating due to lesser post operative pain and soft tissue complications, better functional outcome in terms of AOFAS score and lesser implant related soft tissue complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跟骨关节内骨折经皮空心松质螺钉切开复位钢板内固定
跟骨是最大的跗骨,也是最常见的骨折部位。跟骨骨折约占所有骨折的2%,其中75%为关节内骨折。跟骨关节内骨折解剖修复并不总是与生活质量方面的积极结果相关,因此最佳治疗选择仍有待讨论。切开复位内固定(ORIF)被认为是治疗跟骨骨折的典型方式。另一方面,据报道,ORIF手术后的软组织并发症高达30%。学者们提倡将外固定、经皮空心松质螺钉固定、Schanz pin辅助复位固定作为减少术后并发症的微创方法。在本研究中,我们的目的是研究经皮空心松质螺钉V/S与跟骨钢板切开复位内固定治疗跟骨关节内骨折的疗效。材料与方法:选取22例关节内跟骨骨折(移位> 2mm)患者,经知情书面同意后纳入研究。患者随机分为两组;A组采用微创经皮空心松质螺钉(CC)固定。B组采用钢板切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗。该研究是在2020年5月至2021年5月期间在卡拉德克里希纳医学科学研究所进行的一项随机对照试验。采用PACS计算术前、术后Bohler角,采用AOFAS评分评估术后6个月功能结局,采用VAS评分评估术后疼痛。结果:两种方法对Bohler角的术后维持无显著性差异。但是,在6个月结束时评估的AOFAS评分方面的功能结果表明,与ORIF +跟骨钢板手术患者相比,空心松质螺钉手术患者的结果非常好。与经皮CC螺钉组相比,ORIF加钢板组的术后并发症明显较高。结论:采用空心松质螺钉经皮微创内固定,术后疼痛和软组织并发症较少,AOFAS评分方面功能效果较好,种植体相关软组织并发症较少,是与跟骨钢板ORIF相比更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of platelet rich plasma in the treatment of plantar fasciitis Assessment of proximal tibial fractures managed with locking compression plate Extensor mechanism sparing para tricipital posterior approach to the distal humeral shaft fractures: An alternative approach for fracture treatment Clinical outcomes of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in comminuted fracture of long bones Role of Masquelet’s technique in the induction of membrane and secondary bone grafting in patients of long bone fractures with bone loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1