Joint Ownership Housing in Urban China: A Property Inalienability Perspective

F. Deng
{"title":"Joint Ownership Housing in Urban China: A Property Inalienability Perspective","authors":"F. Deng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3182894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes joint ownership housing (JOH), a new type of low-income housing in China, from a property inalienability perspective. JOH policy that was recently promulgated by the Beijing City shows that local government is really a passive owner in JOH, contradicting a common argument that JOH can realize asset growth for government equity investment. In this sense, JOH is a policy tool that can continuously adjust property inalienability. In JOH, the government maximizes two externalities from property inalienability, namely externality on the homeowner’s production and externality of his/her windfall gain on the society, while the homeowner maximizes his/her financial gains. Nash equilibrium determines optimal equity position of the government and optimal exit timing by the homeowner. Numerical simulation shows that homeowner’s behavior is very sensitive to how housing price changes over time. Small government equity position can easily yield corner solutions in which the homeowner immediately sells the property after the first year. This finding helps to explain why local governments in China often impose a five-year window of inalienability on JOH.","PeriodicalId":196905,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Welfare Programs (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Welfare Programs (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3182894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes joint ownership housing (JOH), a new type of low-income housing in China, from a property inalienability perspective. JOH policy that was recently promulgated by the Beijing City shows that local government is really a passive owner in JOH, contradicting a common argument that JOH can realize asset growth for government equity investment. In this sense, JOH is a policy tool that can continuously adjust property inalienability. In JOH, the government maximizes two externalities from property inalienability, namely externality on the homeowner’s production and externality of his/her windfall gain on the society, while the homeowner maximizes his/her financial gains. Nash equilibrium determines optimal equity position of the government and optimal exit timing by the homeowner. Numerical simulation shows that homeowner’s behavior is very sensitive to how housing price changes over time. Small government equity position can easily yield corner solutions in which the homeowner immediately sells the property after the first year. This finding helps to explain why local governments in China often impose a five-year window of inalienability on JOH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国城市共有住房:财产不可剥夺性视角
本文从财产不可剥夺性的角度对中国新型保障性住房——共有产权住房进行了分析。北京市最近出台的房地产政策表明,地方政府实际上是房地产的被动所有者,这与人们普遍认为房地产可以实现政府股权投资的资产增长的观点相矛盾。从这个意义上说,JOH是一个可以不断调整财产不可让与性的政策工具。在JOH中,政府最大化了财产不可剥夺性的两个外部性,即房主生产的外部性和其意外收获对社会的外部性,而房主则最大化了其经济收益。纳什均衡决定了政府的最优权益地位和房主的最优退出时机。数值模拟表明,房主的行为对房价随时间的变化非常敏感。小政府股权很容易产生街角解决方案,房主在第一年后立即出售房产。这一发现有助于解释为什么中国地方政府经常对JOH施加五年的不可剥夺期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Welfare Loss of Subsidies in Global Electricity Markets SNAP Take-Up and Transaction Costs: An Analysis Using the Food Security Survey Fiscal Federalism and the Budget Impacts of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion Inequality and Spending Policy Solidarity through Redistribution and Insurance of Incomes: The EU As Support, Guide, Guarantor or Provider?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1