Income and Democracy: Lipset's Law Revisited

Anke Hoeffler, R. Bates, G. Fayad
{"title":"Income and Democracy: Lipset's Law Revisited","authors":"Anke Hoeffler, R. Bates, G. Fayad","doi":"10.5089/9781475596649.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit Lipset's law, which posits a positive and significant relationship between income and democracy. Using dynamic and heterogeneous panel data estimation techniques, we find a significant and negative relationship between income and democracy: higher/lower incomes per capita hinder/trigger democratization. Decomposing overall income per capita into its resource and non-resource components, we find that the coefficient on the latter is positive and significant while that on the former is significant but negative, indicating that the role of resource income is central to the result.","PeriodicalId":274895,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Regime Transitions (Topic)","volume":"331 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Regime Transitions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475596649.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

We revisit Lipset's law, which posits a positive and significant relationship between income and democracy. Using dynamic and heterogeneous panel data estimation techniques, we find a significant and negative relationship between income and democracy: higher/lower incomes per capita hinder/trigger democratization. Decomposing overall income per capita into its resource and non-resource components, we find that the coefficient on the latter is positive and significant while that on the former is significant but negative, indicating that the role of resource income is central to the result.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入与民主:重新审视利普塞特定律
我们重新审视利普塞特定律,该定律假定收入与民主之间存在积极而重要的关系。使用动态和异构面板数据估计技术,我们发现收入与民主之间存在显著的负相关关系:人均收入较高/较低阻碍/触发民主化。将人均总收入分解为资源和非资源两部分,发现后者的系数为正且显著,而前者的系数为显著但为负,表明资源收入的作用对结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Connections and the Super-Rich in Poland The Phases of the Postwar Evolution of Capitalism: The Transition from the Current Crisis into a New Worldwide Developmental Trajectory Demand for Constitutional Decentralization Successful and Failed Episodes of Democratization: Conceptualization, Identification, and Description Transition and Gender: Whose Transition Was More Adaptive?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1