Economical assessment of transmission congestion relieving technique for bilateral electricity transaction

N. Wakuta, R. Hara, T. Oyama, K. Okada, I. Kurihara
{"title":"Economical assessment of transmission congestion relieving technique for bilateral electricity transaction","authors":"N. Wakuta, R. Hara, T. Oyama, K. Okada, I. Kurihara","doi":"10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper quantitatively evaluated the performance and characteristics of three kinds of congestion relieving technique (TLR, ranking method and CC method) from the viewpoint of social welfare and congestion charge. The results confirmed that the CC method attains comparatively high social welfare as well as economic fairness in both the simple three-bus system and the IEEJ EAST 10-machine system. Administrative relieving methods might achieve congestion relief with higher social welfare than CC, however, the economic impacts imposed on market participant are unequal. That is, it is difficult to secure economic fairness by administrative methods. Furthermore, numerical studies revealed a negative correlation between total congestion costs and social welfare","PeriodicalId":414346,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper quantitatively evaluated the performance and characteristics of three kinds of congestion relieving technique (TLR, ranking method and CC method) from the viewpoint of social welfare and congestion charge. The results confirmed that the CC method attains comparatively high social welfare as well as economic fairness in both the simple three-bus system and the IEEJ EAST 10-machine system. Administrative relieving methods might achieve congestion relief with higher social welfare than CC, however, the economic impacts imposed on market participant are unequal. That is, it is difficult to secure economic fairness by administrative methods. Furthermore, numerical studies revealed a negative correlation between total congestion costs and social welfare
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双边电力交易中输电拥塞缓解技术的经济评价
本文从社会福利和拥堵收费的角度,定量评价了三种拥堵缓解技术(TLR法、排序法和CC法)的性能和特点。结果表明,CC法在简单三母线系统和IEEJ EAST 10机系统中均具有较高的社会福利和经济公平性。行政救济方式可能比行政救济方式获得更高的社会福利,但对市场参与者的经济影响是不平等的。也就是说,很难通过行政手段来确保经济公平。此外,数值研究揭示了总拥堵成本与社会福利之间的负相关关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practicability of SPS coordination in market environment for impending UCTE-IPS/UPS interconnection Coordinated auction project in Central Europe Congestion management: The system operators challenge to balance transmission transfer capacity with an acceptable security level Congestion management in Japan Financial impacts of congestion relief measures under different congestion management schemes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1