TWO CULTURES : SOCIAL IDEAS AND SOCIAL PRACTICES IN THE PROJECT “POTENTIALS – NEW FORM OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN TOWN COMMUNITY PRZASNYSZ”

K. Frieske
{"title":"TWO CULTURES : SOCIAL IDEAS AND SOCIAL PRACTICES IN THE PROJECT “POTENTIALS – NEW FORM OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN TOWN COMMUNITY PRZASNYSZ”","authors":"K. Frieske","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article consists of two parts. In the first part, the author returns to the classic text by C.P. Snow entitled Two Cultures 1959, and justifies its obsolescence by claiming that in recent decades, the natural sciences have become closer to the traditional humanities and have undergone a kind of 'philosophizing', while knowledge accumulated in the humanities and social sciences is increasingly organized by seeking answers to questions of a practical nature. The author's comment boils down to a statement that this is a very unfortunate course of events because, among other things, before we start answering questions about how to achieve these or other goals, it is good to know that it is worthwhile to achieve them. In short, it is not out of the question that the gradual elimination of classical questions about meanings and values from the humanities and social sciences contributes to highly ambivalent assessments of 'modernity'. In the second part, the author does not ask about the rationale behind the objection to various discriminatory practices, but he does ask how - within the framework of the \"Potentials...\" project - these mechanisms were tried to be dealt with, using the key elements of the so-called \"behavioral economics\", and he describes the experiences connected with it.\n\n","PeriodicalId":345398,"journal":{"name":"Polityka Społeczna","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polityka Społeczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article consists of two parts. In the first part, the author returns to the classic text by C.P. Snow entitled Two Cultures 1959, and justifies its obsolescence by claiming that in recent decades, the natural sciences have become closer to the traditional humanities and have undergone a kind of 'philosophizing', while knowledge accumulated in the humanities and social sciences is increasingly organized by seeking answers to questions of a practical nature. The author's comment boils down to a statement that this is a very unfortunate course of events because, among other things, before we start answering questions about how to achieve these or other goals, it is good to know that it is worthwhile to achieve them. In short, it is not out of the question that the gradual elimination of classical questions about meanings and values from the humanities and social sciences contributes to highly ambivalent assessments of 'modernity'. In the second part, the author does not ask about the rationale behind the objection to various discriminatory practices, but he does ask how - within the framework of the "Potentials..." project - these mechanisms were tried to be dealt with, using the key elements of the so-called "behavioral economics", and he describes the experiences connected with it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种文化:“潜力——城镇社区广场社会资本新形态”项目中的社会观念与社会实践
本文由两部分组成。在第一部分中,作者回到了C.P. Snow的经典文本《两种文化1959》,并通过声称近几十年来,自然科学越来越接近传统的人文科学,并经历了一种“哲学化”,而人文科学和社会科学中积累的知识越来越多地通过寻求实际问题的答案来组织起来,从而为其过时进行了辩解。作者的评论可以归结为一个声明,即这是一个非常不幸的事件进程,因为在我们开始回答有关如何实现这些或其他目标的问题之前,最好知道实现这些目标是值得的。简而言之,从人文和社会科学中逐渐消除关于意义和价值的经典问题,导致对“现代性”的高度矛盾的评估,这不是不可能的。在第二部分中,作者没有询问反对各种歧视性做法背后的理由,但他确实询问了如何在“潜力”项目的框架内,利用所谓的“行为经济学”的关键要素,试图处理这些机制,并描述了与之相关的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION OF SUPPORT FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES – FRAMEWORK, TOOLS AND PRACTICES (INCLUDING THE EXPERIENCE OF THE PILOT PROGRAM) ON THE POSSIBILITIES AND CONDITIONS FOR EFFECTIVE DEINSTITIONALIZATION OF CARE SERVICES SUPPORT FOR THE ELDERLY IN POLAND - IN SEARCH OF NEW SOLUTIONS IN THE FIELD OF SOCIAL SERVICES THE ISSUE OF COOPERATION: LOCAL MULTISECTORALITY AND SOCIAL SERVICE PLANNING APPLICATIONAL OF DIGITAL TOOLS AND TECHONOLOGIES IN SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE – EXPERIENCE FROM THE PROJECT” EDUCATIONAL OF THE FUTURE – DISTANCE VOCATIONAL LEARNING AND TRAINING”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1