{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENDOSCOPIC\nMYRINGOPLASTY V/S MICROSCOPIC MYRINGOPLASTY","authors":"A. Naseem","doi":"10.36611/upjohns/volume10/issue1/2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nChronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is one of\nthe common Otological conditions in India for\nw h i c h p a t i e n t s s e e k a d v i c e f r o m a n\nOtorhinolaryngologists. Poverty, illiteracy,\novercrowding and poor hygiene are all factors\nwhich play an important role in the causation of the\ndisease.\nVarious surgical modalities of treatment have been\ntried since ages to eliminate this disease from the\nmiddle ear cleft. The use of the surgical\nmicroscope brought revolutionary advances into\nthe field of Otological surgery because its new\ntechnology expanded the ability of surgeons to\nsee in limited confines of the temporal bone.\nInitially endoscopes were used only for diagnostic\nand photographic purposes but now endoscopes\nare being used more and more for surgical\npurposes.\nThe current study attempts to study the\nadvantages and disadvantages of endoscopic\nmyringoplasty in comparison to the conventional\nmicroscope assisted myringoplasty.\nOBJECTIVES\nTo e v a l u a t e t h e e ffi c a c y o f E n d o s c o p i c\nmyringoplasty with Microscopic Myringoplasty\nwith reference to hearing and graft uptake\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nFifty cases of clinically diagnosed chronic\nsuppurative otitis media with dry central\nperforation were taken into account of which 25\ncases were undergone endoscopic myringoplasty\na n d 2 5 c a s e s u n d e r g o n e c o n v e n t i o n a l\nmyringoplasty. All patients were followed up till 6\nmonths after surgery.\nRESULTS\nThere was a strong statistical significant difference\nbetween the two groups (p=<0.001) for duration of\nsurgery, hospitalization and hearing gain and graft\nuptake. In endoscopic and conventional groups of\nmyringoplasty, the mean hearing loss improved to\n16.88 dB and 19.76 dB respectively.\nCONCLUSION\nThe surgical outcome of endoscope assisted\nmyringoplasty was comparable in terms of\ntympanic membrane status after surgery, but in\nterms of duration of surgery, hospitalization and\npost-operative air bone gap patients in the\nendoscope group had better results.\nKEYWORDS\nChronic suppurative otitis media, Endoscopic\nMyringoplasty, Microscopic Myringoplasty.","PeriodicalId":356722,"journal":{"name":"First Issue 2022","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Issue 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36611/upjohns/volume10/issue1/2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is one of
the common Otological conditions in India for
w h i c h p a t i e n t s s e e k a d v i c e f r o m a n
Otorhinolaryngologists. Poverty, illiteracy,
overcrowding and poor hygiene are all factors
which play an important role in the causation of the
disease.
Various surgical modalities of treatment have been
tried since ages to eliminate this disease from the
middle ear cleft. The use of the surgical
microscope brought revolutionary advances into
the field of Otological surgery because its new
technology expanded the ability of surgeons to
see in limited confines of the temporal bone.
Initially endoscopes were used only for diagnostic
and photographic purposes but now endoscopes
are being used more and more for surgical
purposes.
The current study attempts to study the
advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic
myringoplasty in comparison to the conventional
microscope assisted myringoplasty.
OBJECTIVES
To e v a l u a t e t h e e ffi c a c y o f E n d o s c o p i c
myringoplasty with Microscopic Myringoplasty
with reference to hearing and graft uptake
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty cases of clinically diagnosed chronic
suppurative otitis media with dry central
perforation were taken into account of which 25
cases were undergone endoscopic myringoplasty
a n d 2 5 c a s e s u n d e r g o n e c o n v e n t i o n a l
myringoplasty. All patients were followed up till 6
months after surgery.
RESULTS
There was a strong statistical significant difference
between the two groups (p=<0.001) for duration of
surgery, hospitalization and hearing gain and graft
uptake. In endoscopic and conventional groups of
myringoplasty, the mean hearing loss improved to
16.88 dB and 19.76 dB respectively.
CONCLUSION
The surgical outcome of endoscope assisted
myringoplasty was comparable in terms of
tympanic membrane status after surgery, but in
terms of duration of surgery, hospitalization and
post-operative air bone gap patients in the
endoscope group had better results.
KEYWORDS
Chronic suppurative otitis media, Endoscopic
Myringoplasty, Microscopic Myringoplasty.
慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)是印度常见的耳科疾病之一,在印度,慢性化脓性中耳炎是一种常见的耳科疾病,在印度,慢性化脓性中耳炎是一种常见的耳科疾病。贫穷、文盲、过度拥挤和卫生条件差都是导致这种疾病的重要因素。多年来,人们尝试了各种手术治疗方式来消除中耳裂的这种疾病。外科显微镜的使用为耳科外科领域带来了革命性的进步,因为它的新技术扩大了外科医生在有限的颞骨范围内观察的能力。最初内窥镜仅用于诊断和摄影目的,但现在内窥镜越来越多地用于外科目的。本研究试图研究内镜下的鼓膜成形术与常规显微镜辅助下的鼓膜成形术的优缺点。OBJECTIVESTo e v t l u e t h e e ffi c c y o f e n c d o s o p我与微观cmyringoplasty Myringoplastywith参考听力和贪污uptakeMATERIALS METHODSFifty临床诊断病例chronicsuppurative中耳炎用干centralperforation考虑在内的25例接受内镜myringoplastya n d 2 5 c s e s u n d e r g o n e c o n v e n t i o n lmyringoplasty。所有患者均随访至术后6个月。结果两组患者手术时间、住院时间、听力增益和接穗量比较,差异均有统计学意义(p=<0.001)。内窥镜组和常规鼓膜成形术组的平均听力损失分别改善到16.88 dB和19.76 dB。结论内窥镜辅助鼓膜成形术两组在术后鼓膜状态方面疗效相当,但在手术时间、住院时间及术后气骨间隙患者方面,内窥镜组效果更好。【关键词】慢性化脓性中耳炎;内镜下耳膜成形术;镜下耳膜成形术;