The Picture Vanishes

Margaret Dalivalle, M. Kemp, R. B. Simon
{"title":"The Picture Vanishes","authors":"Margaret Dalivalle, M. Kemp, R. B. Simon","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 15 investigates the circumstances around the apparent absence of the Salvator Mundi in the collection of King James II, with a particular focus on events in the immediate aftermath of the ‘Revolution’ of 1688. A number of possibilities present themselves. Did the painting pass out of the Royal Collection before the accession of James II in 1685? Did the dowager queen, Henrietta Maria, take it to a property of her jointure, or to France? Was the painting taken to Portugal by Queen Catherine of Braganza after the death of Charles II? This chapter considers the evidence of a key witness to events, and whether a painting described as a ‘Head of Our Saviour’, attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, sold out of the collection of the Duke of Buckingham in 1763, can be identified with the painting recorded in the collections of Charles I and Charles II. If so, by which route did it leave the Royal Collection and enter the Buckingham collection?","PeriodicalId":347013,"journal":{"name":"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 15 investigates the circumstances around the apparent absence of the Salvator Mundi in the collection of King James II, with a particular focus on events in the immediate aftermath of the ‘Revolution’ of 1688. A number of possibilities present themselves. Did the painting pass out of the Royal Collection before the accession of James II in 1685? Did the dowager queen, Henrietta Maria, take it to a property of her jointure, or to France? Was the painting taken to Portugal by Queen Catherine of Braganza after the death of Charles II? This chapter considers the evidence of a key witness to events, and whether a painting described as a ‘Head of Our Saviour’, attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, sold out of the collection of the Duke of Buckingham in 1763, can be identified with the painting recorded in the collections of Charles I and Charles II. If so, by which route did it leave the Royal Collection and enter the Buckingham collection?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
画面消失
第十五章调查了《救世主》在詹姆斯二世的合集中明显缺席的情况,特别关注1688年“革命”之后发生的事件。有许多可能性。这幅画是在1685年詹姆斯二世即位之前离开皇家收藏的吗?太后亨利埃塔·玛丽亚把它带到了她的遗产,还是带到了法国?这幅画是在查理二世死后由布拉干萨的凯瑟琳王后带到葡萄牙的吗?这一章考虑了事件的关键证人的证据,以及一幅被描述为“我们的救世主的头”的画,被认为是达芬奇的,在1763年白金汉公爵的收藏中卖光,是否可以与查尔斯一世和查理二世的收藏中记录的画相一致。如果是这样,它是通过什么途径离开皇家收藏进入白金汉收藏的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drawings and Dates The Picture Vanishes Appraising Leonardo ‘Capitanus Stone’ Patronage, Some Copies, and Other Versions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1