The comparative study in reading comprehension achievement on students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles

Risa Destriani Riduan, Bambang Setiyadi, Huzairin Huzairin
{"title":"The comparative study in reading comprehension achievement on students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles","authors":"Risa Destriani Riduan, Bambang Setiyadi, Huzairin Huzairin","doi":"10.23960/ujet.v10.i2.202112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading has an influential role in language achievement where each student has their own preferred way to guide them which is called learning styles. The researcher interested in conducting the comparative study because students’ learning styles i.e., visual, auditory, and kinesthetic have dissimilar attainment in reading comprehension. The objectives of this research were to determine i) the significant difference in students’ reading comprehension achievement among students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles and ii) the highest and lowest reading aspect of each VAK student’s achievement. The approach of this research was quantitative. The sample of this research was 30 students in X IPA 6 of SMAN 3 Bandar Lampung chosen by purposive sampling method. Questionnaires and reading test were used to collect the data. The data were analyzed by using One Way Anova and MANOVA in SPSS 17.0 for Windows. The result showed there was a significant difference in students’ reading comprehension achievement based on their learning style since the f-value was 1.287 with the alpha 0.07. In addition, the result of the VAK students’ achievement showed the highest aspect of visual students was determining vocabulary, while the highest aspect of auditory and kinesthetic students was determining reference. The lowest aspect of visual and auditory students was finding main idea while the lowest aspect of kinesthetic students was making inference. Keywords: reading comprehension, reading achievement, visual, auditory, kinesthetic","PeriodicalId":300659,"journal":{"name":"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/ujet.v10.i2.202112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reading has an influential role in language achievement where each student has their own preferred way to guide them which is called learning styles. The researcher interested in conducting the comparative study because students’ learning styles i.e., visual, auditory, and kinesthetic have dissimilar attainment in reading comprehension. The objectives of this research were to determine i) the significant difference in students’ reading comprehension achievement among students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles and ii) the highest and lowest reading aspect of each VAK student’s achievement. The approach of this research was quantitative. The sample of this research was 30 students in X IPA 6 of SMAN 3 Bandar Lampung chosen by purposive sampling method. Questionnaires and reading test were used to collect the data. The data were analyzed by using One Way Anova and MANOVA in SPSS 17.0 for Windows. The result showed there was a significant difference in students’ reading comprehension achievement based on their learning style since the f-value was 1.287 with the alpha 0.07. In addition, the result of the VAK students’ achievement showed the highest aspect of visual students was determining vocabulary, while the highest aspect of auditory and kinesthetic students was determining reference. The lowest aspect of visual and auditory students was finding main idea while the lowest aspect of kinesthetic students was making inference. Keywords: reading comprehension, reading achievement, visual, auditory, kinesthetic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格学生阅读理解成绩的比较研究
阅读在语言成就中起着重要的作用,每个学生都有自己喜欢的指导方式,这被称为学习风格。研究者之所以有兴趣进行比较研究,是因为视觉、听觉和动觉三种学习方式的学生在阅读理解上的成就不同。本研究的目的是确定i)视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格的学生在阅读理解成绩上的显著差异;ii)每个VAK学生的阅读成绩的最高和最低方面。本研究的方法是定量的。本研究采用目的抽样法选取南榜市SMAN 3班X IPA 6班30名学生为样本。采用问卷调查和阅读测试收集数据。采用SPSS 17.0 for Windows软件进行单因素方差分析(One Way Anova)和方差分析(MANOVA)。结果显示,不同学习风格的学生在阅读理解成绩上存在显著差异,f值为1.287,alpha值为0.07。此外,VAK学生的成绩结果显示,视觉学生的最高方面是确定词汇,而听觉和动觉学生的最高方面是确定参考。视觉和听觉学生在寻找主旨方面表现最差,而动觉学生在推理方面表现最差。关键词:阅读理解,阅读成就,视觉,听觉,动觉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving students' writing achievement in descriptive text through FRESH technique at the first grade of SMPN 32 Bekasi The implementation of Mind mapping technique in teaching reading comprehension The implementation of Guessing Game technique in teaching speaking Improving Students Reading Comprehension Through Information Gap Technique Vocabulary Mastery in Different Language Learning Strategies of The Beginner Language Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1