The Market Dominance of US Digital Platforms: Antitrust Implications for the European Union

ERN: Monopoly Pub Date : 2018-04-20 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2977933
Stéphane Ciriani, M. Lebourges
{"title":"The Market Dominance of US Digital Platforms: Antitrust Implications for the European Union","authors":"Stéphane Ciriani, M. Lebourges","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2977933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The persistent dominance of US digital platforms relates to strategies that can be justified on efficiency grounds. However, these strategies might also offset competition and have ambiguous welfare effects. Overall, though, the economic literature does not provide a clear theoretical ground for a systematic regulation of their dominance, rather it advocates a targeting of specific unlawful anticompetitive practices. The examination of the rationale of major antitrust cases vis-a-vis global digital platforms suggests that EU authorities should adjust their doctrine and practice of competition policy to make it closer to the US approach. This realigning would serve the purpose of building a competitive EU digital ecosystem and a more balanced and efficient worldwide competition between all digital providers. In addition, EU competition authorities should also support price caps as welfare enhancing forms of cooperation, which could allow the emergence of platform pricing strategies within competitive markets and not only within monopolies.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2977933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The persistent dominance of US digital platforms relates to strategies that can be justified on efficiency grounds. However, these strategies might also offset competition and have ambiguous welfare effects. Overall, though, the economic literature does not provide a clear theoretical ground for a systematic regulation of their dominance, rather it advocates a targeting of specific unlawful anticompetitive practices. The examination of the rationale of major antitrust cases vis-a-vis global digital platforms suggests that EU authorities should adjust their doctrine and practice of competition policy to make it closer to the US approach. This realigning would serve the purpose of building a competitive EU digital ecosystem and a more balanced and efficient worldwide competition between all digital providers. In addition, EU competition authorities should also support price caps as welfare enhancing forms of cooperation, which could allow the emergence of platform pricing strategies within competitive markets and not only within monopolies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国数字平台的市场主导地位:对欧盟的反垄断影响
美国数字平台的持续主导地位与从效率角度来看合理的战略有关。然而,这些策略也可能抵消竞争,并产生模糊的福利效应。然而,总体而言,经济学文献并没有为系统地监管它们的主导地位提供明确的理论依据,而是主张针对特定的非法反竞争行为。对针对全球数字平台的重大反垄断案件的理论依据的研究表明,欧盟当局应调整其竞争政策的理论和实践,使其更接近美国的做法。这种调整将有助于建立一个有竞争力的欧盟数字生态系统,并在所有数字提供商之间实现更平衡、更有效的全球竞争。此外,欧盟竞争管理机构还应支持价格上限,将其作为提高福利的合作形式,这可能允许在竞争市场(而不仅仅是在垄断市场)中出现平台定价策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Collective Agreement is Not Inherently Anti Competitive in Japan: Trade Unions, Self-Employed Workers and the Antimonopoly Act The Cost and Benefit of Dynamic Pricing Does Local Competition and Firm Market Power Affect Investment Adviser Misconduct? Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale Divide and Conquer in Two-Sided Markets: A Potential-Game Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1