Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale

ERN: Monopoly Pub Date : 2020-04-09 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3585005
S. Loertscher, Ellen V. Muir
{"title":"Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale","authors":"S. Loertscher, Ellen V. Muir","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3585005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a parsimonious and unified explanation for randomized selling mechanisms widely used in practice, yet commonly perceived as puzzling. We show that randomization implemented via opaque pricing and underpricing is optimal only if the revenue function with market clearing pricing is non-concave. Randomization involves conflation and rationing and, relative to market clearing pricing, leads to larger quantities sold. If this quantity effect is sufficiently strong, randomization increases consumer surplus. For fixed quantities resale increases consumer surplus. However, if resale is sufficiently efficient then consumer surplus can be larger under resale prohibition because resale reduces the equilibrium quantities.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3585005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This paper provides a parsimonious and unified explanation for randomized selling mechanisms widely used in practice, yet commonly perceived as puzzling. We show that randomization implemented via opaque pricing and underpricing is optimal only if the revenue function with market clearing pricing is non-concave. Randomization involves conflation and rationing and, relative to market clearing pricing, leads to larger quantities sold. If this quantity effect is sufficiently strong, randomization increases consumer surplus. For fixed quantities resale increases consumer surplus. However, if resale is sufficiently efficient then consumer surplus can be larger under resale prohibition because resale reduces the equilibrium quantities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垄断定价、最优随机化与转售
本文为实践中广泛使用的随机销售机制提供了一个简洁而统一的解释,但通常被认为是令人困惑的。我们证明了通过不透明定价和欠定价实现的随机化只有在具有市场出清定价的收益函数非凹时才是最优的。随机化涉及合并和定量配给,相对于市场出清定价,会导致更大的销售量。如果这种数量效应足够强,随机化会增加消费者剩余。对于固定数量的转售,增加了消费者剩余。然而,如果转售足够有效,那么在禁止转售的情况下,消费者剩余可以更大,因为转售减少了均衡数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Collective Agreement is Not Inherently Anti Competitive in Japan: Trade Unions, Self-Employed Workers and the Antimonopoly Act The Cost and Benefit of Dynamic Pricing Does Local Competition and Firm Market Power Affect Investment Adviser Misconduct? Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale Divide and Conquer in Two-Sided Markets: A Potential-Game Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1