A Case Study of Stakeholder Concerns on EAM

Simon Hacks, Maximilian Brosius, Stephan Aier
{"title":"A Case Study of Stakeholder Concerns on EAM","authors":"Simon Hacks, Maximilian Brosius, Stephan Aier","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2017.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of growing complexities in business processes, information systems, and the technical infrastructure, a key challenge for enterprise architecture management (EAM) is to guide stakeholders from different hierarchical levels with heterogeneous concerns. EA deliverables, such as models or frameworks, are often highly comprehensive and standardized. However, these can hardly be applied without greater adaption. Although the literature selectively covers approaches for tailoring EA deliverables closer to the concerns of affected stakeholders, these approaches are often vague or not very differentiated. In the paper at hand, we aim at introducing a stakeholder perspective to EAM research that considers stakeholder concerns on EAM across hierarchical levels. To this end, we conduct a case study: Our results show homogenous concerns among stakeholders on EA deliverables. In turn, we found different concerns on the role of EAM in applying these deliverables, dependent on the hierarchical level of stakeholders. These findings stress the necessity for a more differentiated understanding of stakeholder concerns on EAM. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for an exemplary EAM approach.","PeriodicalId":315067,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2017.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

As a result of growing complexities in business processes, information systems, and the technical infrastructure, a key challenge for enterprise architecture management (EAM) is to guide stakeholders from different hierarchical levels with heterogeneous concerns. EA deliverables, such as models or frameworks, are often highly comprehensive and standardized. However, these can hardly be applied without greater adaption. Although the literature selectively covers approaches for tailoring EA deliverables closer to the concerns of affected stakeholders, these approaches are often vague or not very differentiated. In the paper at hand, we aim at introducing a stakeholder perspective to EAM research that considers stakeholder concerns on EAM across hierarchical levels. To this end, we conduct a case study: Our results show homogenous concerns among stakeholders on EA deliverables. In turn, we found different concerns on the role of EAM in applying these deliverables, dependent on the hierarchical level of stakeholders. These findings stress the necessity for a more differentiated understanding of stakeholder concerns on EAM. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for an exemplary EAM approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EAM中利益相关者关注的案例研究
由于业务流程、信息系统和技术基础设施的复杂性不断增加,企业架构管理(EAM)面临的一个关键挑战是,如何从具有异构关注点的不同层次来指导涉众。EA交付物,例如模型或框架,通常是高度全面和标准化的。然而,如果没有更大的适应,这些很难应用。尽管文献选择性地涵盖了裁剪EA可交付成果的方法,使其更接近受影响涉众的关注点,但是这些方法通常是模糊的,或者不是很有区别的。在手头的论文中,我们的目标是将利益相关者的观点引入到EAM研究中,该研究考虑了利益相关者对EAM的跨层次关注。为此,我们进行了一个案例研究:我们的结果显示了EA可交付成果的涉众之间的同质关注点。反过来,我们发现EAM在应用这些可交付成果时所扮演的角色有不同的关注点,这取决于涉众的层次层次。这些发现强调了对利益相关者在EAM上的关注点进行更有区别的理解的必要性。最后,我们讨论了我们的发现对典型的EAM方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Study of Stakeholder Concerns on EAM Aligning Service Level Agreements with Service-Oriented Enterprise Architecture Evaluation of the risk and security overlay of archimate to model information system security risks Services as Activities: Towards a Unified Definition for (Public) Services A Mathematical Model for Evaluation of Data Analytics Implementation Alternatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1