Federalism and Federalization on the Fintech Frontier

ERN: National Pub Date : 2017-03-08 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3191501
Brian R. Knight
{"title":"Federalism and Federalization on the Fintech Frontier","authors":"Brian R. Knight","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3191501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of financial technology (fintech) has the potential to provide better-quality financial services to more people. Although these enhanced financial services have arisen to meet consumer need, their regulatory status threatens that progress. Many fintech firms are regulated on a state-by-state basis even though their transactions are interstate, and they compete with firms that enjoy more consistent rules through federal preemption. This dynamic can harm efficiency, competitive equity, and political equity. This paper looks at developments in marketplace lending, money transmission, and online sales of securities in an attempt to identify situations in which greater federalization of the rules may be justified. It also considers a situation in which the federal government should abstain from intervening, even if it has the right to do so. Whether the states or federal government should take the lead in regulating fintech is an emerging and important question whose answer will affect the financial lives of consumers and investors. This paper seeks to begin a conversation about how we determine whether federalism or federalization is appropriate.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"413 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The rise of financial technology (fintech) has the potential to provide better-quality financial services to more people. Although these enhanced financial services have arisen to meet consumer need, their regulatory status threatens that progress. Many fintech firms are regulated on a state-by-state basis even though their transactions are interstate, and they compete with firms that enjoy more consistent rules through federal preemption. This dynamic can harm efficiency, competitive equity, and political equity. This paper looks at developments in marketplace lending, money transmission, and online sales of securities in an attempt to identify situations in which greater federalization of the rules may be justified. It also considers a situation in which the federal government should abstain from intervening, even if it has the right to do so. Whether the states or federal government should take the lead in regulating fintech is an emerging and important question whose answer will affect the financial lives of consumers and investors. This paper seeks to begin a conversation about how we determine whether federalism or federalization is appropriate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技前沿的联邦制和联邦化
金融科技(fintech)的兴起有可能为更多人提供更优质的金融服务。虽然这些增强的金融服务是为了满足消费者的需求而出现的,但它们的监管地位威胁着这一进程。许多金融科技公司受到各州的监管,尽管它们的交易是跨州的,而且它们与那些通过联邦优先购买权享受更一致规则的公司竞争。这种动态会损害效率、竞争公平和政治公平。本文着眼于市场借贷、货币传输和在线证券销售的发展,试图确定在何种情况下更大的联邦化规则可能是合理的。它还考虑了一种情况,即联邦政府应该避免干预,即使它有权这样做。州政府还是联邦政府应该带头监管金融科技是一个新兴的重要问题,其答案将影响消费者和投资者的金融生活。本文试图开始讨论我们如何确定联邦制或联邦化是否合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues Australian Federalism in James Buchanan's Early Work on Fiscal Equity Convergence across Subnational Regions of Bangladesh – What the Night Lights Data Say? The Effects of Local Government Financial Distress: Evidence from Toxic Loans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1