VisualMail+ as a Dialogue-oriented Forum: An Empirical Case about Cooperation and Learning

Edmundo P. Leiva-Lobos, H. Ponce, Santiago J. Braganza
{"title":"VisualMail+ as a Dialogue-oriented Forum: An Empirical Case about Cooperation and Learning","authors":"Edmundo P. Leiva-Lobos, H. Ponce, Santiago J. Braganza","doi":"10.1109/SCCC51225.2020.9281217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study experimentally tested whether cooperation among participants increases when they use a forum application with added functionalities derived from the language-action and situated-action perspectives compared with participating in a forum without such features. We used two versions of a visual-based forum application that included functionalities to visualize the threads of an argumentation. The first one is called VisualMail, and the situated language-action enriched-forum is called VisualMail+. A total of 84 college students participated in the study and were randomly assigned to one of 20 different groups. Subsequently, these groups were randomly assigned to use VisualMail or VisualMail+. The results indicate that using VisualMail+ significantly increases cooperation among participants compared with VisualMail, with a large effect size (d = 1.01).","PeriodicalId":117157,"journal":{"name":"2020 39th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 39th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC51225.2020.9281217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study experimentally tested whether cooperation among participants increases when they use a forum application with added functionalities derived from the language-action and situated-action perspectives compared with participating in a forum without such features. We used two versions of a visual-based forum application that included functionalities to visualize the threads of an argumentation. The first one is called VisualMail, and the situated language-action enriched-forum is called VisualMail+. A total of 84 college students participated in the study and were randomly assigned to one of 20 different groups. Subsequently, these groups were randomly assigned to use VisualMail or VisualMail+. The results indicate that using VisualMail+ significantly increases cooperation among participants compared with VisualMail, with a large effect size (d = 1.01).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VisualMail+作为对话导向的论坛:关于合作与学习的实证案例
本研究通过实验测试了当参与者使用带有语言-行动和情境-行动视角的附加功能的论坛应用程序时,他们之间的合作是否比使用没有这些功能的论坛应用程序时有所增加。我们使用了两个版本的基于可视化的论坛应用程序,其中包括可视化论证线程的功能。第一个被称为VisualMail,而位于语言-动作丰富的论坛被称为VisualMail+。共有84名大学生参加了这项研究,他们被随机分配到20个不同的小组中。随后,这些组被随机分配使用VisualMail或VisualMail+。结果表明,与使用VisualMail相比,使用VisualMail+显著提高了被试之间的合作程度,且效应量较大(d = 1.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EM-(RA)2: a tool support proposal for Learning Outcomes and the Teaching-Learning Process Prediction of student’s retention in first year of engineering program at a technological chilean university Modelo de evaluación gamificado en cursos de algoritmos y programación New initialization for algorithms to solve Median String Problem Heuristic Function to Solve The Generalized Covering TSP with Artificial Intelligence Search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1