Introduction: The Natural Turn in Early Modern Russian History

Anna Graber, C. Griffin, Rachel Koroloff, Audra Yoder
{"title":"Introduction: The Natural Turn in Early Modern Russian History","authors":"Anna Graber, C. Griffin, Rachel Koroloff, Audra Yoder","doi":"10.21900/j.vivliofika.v6.542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introduction to the Vivliofika special issue, Animal, Vegetable, Mineral, illuminates the rich scholarship examining ideas about nature in the early modern Russian context. Starting with the basic question of how early modern Russians conceived of the natural world, the authors explore the numerous ways in which this question has been asked and answered by Russian historians and historians of science from the mid-twentieth century on. Acknowledging that these questions have recently been treated differently, the authors argue for a ‘natural turn’ in the scholarship. This introduction brings together Anglophone and Russophone literature to sketch the state the field before offering a relatively brief but nuanced history of the concept of the ‘Three Kingdoms of Nature’ (Tria Regna Naturae) which frames the project as a whole. The authors show how the early eighteenth-century articulation of the Tria Regna Naturae sat at the confluence of ancient Greek, early Christian, and more modern, cameralist attempts to classify and divide, and thereby understand the natural world. Muscovite and early modern Russian approaches to the question of the natural world were influenced by this Western historiography, and yet they stood apart from those traditions in interesting ways detailed by the essays in this volume. Ultimately the authors here advance new methods for understanding how early modern Russians understood the natural world, methods which focus on the practices of knowledge making in general, and those of transcription, translation, and illustration in specific.","PeriodicalId":269883,"journal":{"name":"ВИВЛIОθИКА: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ВИВЛIОθИКА: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21900/j.vivliofika.v6.542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This introduction to the Vivliofika special issue, Animal, Vegetable, Mineral, illuminates the rich scholarship examining ideas about nature in the early modern Russian context. Starting with the basic question of how early modern Russians conceived of the natural world, the authors explore the numerous ways in which this question has been asked and answered by Russian historians and historians of science from the mid-twentieth century on. Acknowledging that these questions have recently been treated differently, the authors argue for a ‘natural turn’ in the scholarship. This introduction brings together Anglophone and Russophone literature to sketch the state the field before offering a relatively brief but nuanced history of the concept of the ‘Three Kingdoms of Nature’ (Tria Regna Naturae) which frames the project as a whole. The authors show how the early eighteenth-century articulation of the Tria Regna Naturae sat at the confluence of ancient Greek, early Christian, and more modern, cameralist attempts to classify and divide, and thereby understand the natural world. Muscovite and early modern Russian approaches to the question of the natural world were influenced by this Western historiography, and yet they stood apart from those traditions in interesting ways detailed by the essays in this volume. Ultimately the authors here advance new methods for understanding how early modern Russians understood the natural world, methods which focus on the practices of knowledge making in general, and those of transcription, translation, and illustration in specific.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论:近代俄国历史的自然转向
这篇对《动物、蔬菜、矿物》特刊的介绍,阐明了在早期现代俄罗斯背景下研究自然观念的丰富学术。从早期现代俄罗斯人如何看待自然世界的基本问题开始,作者探索了从20世纪中期开始,俄罗斯历史学家和科学史学家提出和回答这个问题的多种方式。作者承认,这些问题最近受到了不同的对待,他们认为这是学术研究的“自然转向”。本引言汇集了英语和俄语文献,概述了该领域的状态,然后提供了一个相对简短但细致入微的“自然三国”(Tria Regna Naturae)概念的历史,将该项目作为一个整体框架。作者展示了18世纪早期的《自然》(Tria Regna Naturae)是如何融合了古希腊、早期基督教和更现代的摄影师对自然世界的分类和划分,从而理解自然世界的尝试。莫斯科人和早期现代俄罗斯人对自然世界问题的研究方法受到了西方史学的影响,但他们在一些有趣的方面与这些传统有所不同,这些细节在本卷的文章中有详细介绍。最后,作者在这里提出了新的方法来理解早期现代俄罗斯人是如何理解自然世界的,这些方法集中在一般的知识创造实践上,以及那些具体的转录、翻译和插图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Скиты” веселой Елизавет: Русские эрмитажи середины XVIII века Что нового рассказал “Мисопогон”о взаимоотношениях Петра I и его подданных? Andrei Matveev: Painting Allegory from Antwerp to Russia Entire Volume Translation as Politics: Translating Nikolai Karamzin’s Letters of a Russian Traveler in Nineteenth-Century France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1