Oxidant selection and evaluation for subsea power systems

I. Potter, G. Reader, E. Clavelle, J. Kady, M. Carl
{"title":"Oxidant selection and evaluation for subsea power systems","authors":"I. Potter, G. Reader, E. Clavelle, J. Kady, M. Carl","doi":"10.1109/UT.2000.852555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to commercially, scientifically and militarily exploit the oceans has increased dramatically over the last 30 years. With this requirement has been generated the need for efficient underwater vessels capable of extended endurance, autonomy, high reliability and increased power density. In the past the majority of these vessels have been powered by secondary batteries, however, with the previous criteria in mind, batteries are in many instances no longer capable of meeting mission objectives. Advancements in air independent heat engines requires the use of stored chemical energy, normally in the form of hydrocarbon fuel and an oxidant. In the latter case, the oxidant volumetric and gravimetric storage densities can be changed by storing or deriving the oxygen from several different sources such as pure oxygen, oxygen rich compounds and oxygen extraction from seawater by electrolysis or membranes. Each oxygen source offers a different oxygen liberation capability, as well as dissimilar storage densities. Apart from the physical properties of the different oxidants, they each require a different type of containment and operating system. All of these factors will affect the total oxygen system weight and volume requirements. To understand the trade-offs involved in the oxidant system used for a particular vehicle and mission profile, this paper assesses the selection and evaluation of the possible oxygen sources required for hydrocarbon fuelled heat engines.","PeriodicalId":397110,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Underwater Technology (Cat. No.00EX418)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Underwater Technology (Cat. No.00EX418)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UT.2000.852555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The need to commercially, scientifically and militarily exploit the oceans has increased dramatically over the last 30 years. With this requirement has been generated the need for efficient underwater vessels capable of extended endurance, autonomy, high reliability and increased power density. In the past the majority of these vessels have been powered by secondary batteries, however, with the previous criteria in mind, batteries are in many instances no longer capable of meeting mission objectives. Advancements in air independent heat engines requires the use of stored chemical energy, normally in the form of hydrocarbon fuel and an oxidant. In the latter case, the oxidant volumetric and gravimetric storage densities can be changed by storing or deriving the oxygen from several different sources such as pure oxygen, oxygen rich compounds and oxygen extraction from seawater by electrolysis or membranes. Each oxygen source offers a different oxygen liberation capability, as well as dissimilar storage densities. Apart from the physical properties of the different oxidants, they each require a different type of containment and operating system. All of these factors will affect the total oxygen system weight and volume requirements. To understand the trade-offs involved in the oxidant system used for a particular vehicle and mission profile, this paper assesses the selection and evaluation of the possible oxygen sources required for hydrocarbon fuelled heat engines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海底电力系统氧化剂选择与评价
在过去30年中,商业、科学和军事开发海洋的需要急剧增加。随着这一要求的出现,人们对高效水下航行器的需求也随之产生,这些水下航行器具有更长的续航能力、自主性、高可靠性和更高的功率密度。在过去,这些船只中的大多数都是由二次电池供电的,然而,考虑到以前的标准,电池在许多情况下不再能够满足任务目标。不依赖空气的热机的进步需要使用储存的化学能,通常以碳氢化合物燃料和氧化剂的形式存在。在后一种情况下,可以通过储存或从几种不同的来源获得氧气,如纯氧、富氧化合物和通过电解或膜从海水中提取氧气,来改变氧化剂的体积和重量储存密度。每个氧源提供不同的氧释放能力,以及不同的存储密度。除了不同氧化剂的物理性质外,它们都需要不同类型的容器和操作系统。所有这些因素都会影响氧气系统的总重量和体积要求。为了了解用于特定车辆和任务剖面的氧化剂系统所涉及的权衡,本文评估了碳氢化合物燃料热机所需的可能氧源的选择和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Autonomous underwater vehicle AQUA EXPLORER 2 for inspection of underwater cables Explorer-a modular AUV for commercial site survey Nonlinear H/sub /spl infin// optimal PID control of autonomous underwater vehicles Underwater imaging system using acoustic holography Exhaust gas management systems for underwater heat engines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1