{"title":"ON THE HISTORY OF SCYTHIAN POLE-TOPS STUDY","authors":"O. Frunt","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2021.04.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metal pole-tops of the 7th—4th centuries BC is one of the most wander materials associated with the tribes of the Eastern and Central Europe of the Scythian Age. However, opinions on their function are diverse. Now the pole-tops have a rather general name reflecting the purpose of these objects only approximately. Nevertheless, the study of these artifacts allow us to distinguish three periods: the first (1850—1940s), the second (1950—1980s) and the third (from the 1990s to the present). \nThe first period (1950—1980s) begins with the excavations by I. E. Zabelin of steppe aristocratic barrows. In such barrows as Krasnokutsky, Slonovskaya Bliznitsa, Chertomlyk, a lot of Scythian pole-tops have been discovered. Thanks to localization of the finds in the burials I. E. Zabelin was able to suggest the function of these objects. He believed that the pole-tops could be the decoration of carts, nomadic tents on a chariot. \nThe period is associated with the works of A. S. Lappo-Danilevsky, E. Minns, I. I. Tolstoy and N. P. Kondakov, J. Hampel, P. Reinicke, L. Marton et al. The result was summed up in the research of M. I. Rostovtsev. He supports the idea of a funerary vehicle and connects the origin of the finds with Hittite and Assyrian art, Transcaucasian tombs. \nIn the second period (1950—1980s) there is a noticeable intensity of research on Scythian pole-tops, systematization of artifacts and the use of new approaches to the study. The typology proposed at this time is still used in research now. Almost all finds known at the end of the 70s were systematized in the paper by E. V. Perevodchikova. Different approaches were used in order to interpret the meaning of the pole-tops: as a part of the drawbar of a chariot (V. V. Shleev), shamanic musical instruments (K. Bakai), as the embodiment of the idea of a world tree which marks the ritual space (E. V. Perevodchikova, D. S. Raevsky). V. A. Ilyinskaya considered these artifacts to be multifunctional. The study of the chemical composition of the metal by T. B. Bartseva is important, since it demonstrates the existence of several production centers and sheds light on the origin of the finds. \nIn the third period (from the 1990s to the present) the issue of the functional purpose and origin of the Scythian pole-tops was clarified. The scholars consider them the indicators, marking the arrival of Scythians in North Caucasus and North Pontic region (V. I. Klochko, V. Yu. Murzin, A. Yu. Alekseev, S. A. Skory, D. S. Grechko). T. V. Ryabkova connects the origin of the spherical pole-tops with the eastern territories considering these finds to be purely nomadic. N. L. Chlenova, M. M. Pogrebova, M. Castelluccia, R. Dan lead the line of origin of Scythian pole-tops from the rattles of Iran and Transcaucasia. \nThe study of the technology of making bronze finds and their designs shows that they were cast on a lost wax model or in bivalve molds. In the interpretation of the function of Scythian pole-tops in the period of the 1990s—2010s the researchers depending on the context of discovery correlate these objects from burials with carts (Yu. V. Boltryk) or wooden poles that limited the ritual space for sacrifices (A. R. Kantorovich, V. R. Erlikh). H. Parzinger and S. Hasanov associate their use with shamanism. \nThus, the history of the study of Scythian pole-tops made it possible to highlight topical issues. These are the origin and function, improvement of typology using new methods, clarification of chronology, correlation of the distribution of finds with key events in history in Eastern and Central Europe during the Scythian Age.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2021.04.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Metal pole-tops of the 7th—4th centuries BC is one of the most wander materials associated with the tribes of the Eastern and Central Europe of the Scythian Age. However, opinions on their function are diverse. Now the pole-tops have a rather general name reflecting the purpose of these objects only approximately. Nevertheless, the study of these artifacts allow us to distinguish three periods: the first (1850—1940s), the second (1950—1980s) and the third (from the 1990s to the present).
The first period (1950—1980s) begins with the excavations by I. E. Zabelin of steppe aristocratic barrows. In such barrows as Krasnokutsky, Slonovskaya Bliznitsa, Chertomlyk, a lot of Scythian pole-tops have been discovered. Thanks to localization of the finds in the burials I. E. Zabelin was able to suggest the function of these objects. He believed that the pole-tops could be the decoration of carts, nomadic tents on a chariot.
The period is associated with the works of A. S. Lappo-Danilevsky, E. Minns, I. I. Tolstoy and N. P. Kondakov, J. Hampel, P. Reinicke, L. Marton et al. The result was summed up in the research of M. I. Rostovtsev. He supports the idea of a funerary vehicle and connects the origin of the finds with Hittite and Assyrian art, Transcaucasian tombs.
In the second period (1950—1980s) there is a noticeable intensity of research on Scythian pole-tops, systematization of artifacts and the use of new approaches to the study. The typology proposed at this time is still used in research now. Almost all finds known at the end of the 70s were systematized in the paper by E. V. Perevodchikova. Different approaches were used in order to interpret the meaning of the pole-tops: as a part of the drawbar of a chariot (V. V. Shleev), shamanic musical instruments (K. Bakai), as the embodiment of the idea of a world tree which marks the ritual space (E. V. Perevodchikova, D. S. Raevsky). V. A. Ilyinskaya considered these artifacts to be multifunctional. The study of the chemical composition of the metal by T. B. Bartseva is important, since it demonstrates the existence of several production centers and sheds light on the origin of the finds.
In the third period (from the 1990s to the present) the issue of the functional purpose and origin of the Scythian pole-tops was clarified. The scholars consider them the indicators, marking the arrival of Scythians in North Caucasus and North Pontic region (V. I. Klochko, V. Yu. Murzin, A. Yu. Alekseev, S. A. Skory, D. S. Grechko). T. V. Ryabkova connects the origin of the spherical pole-tops with the eastern territories considering these finds to be purely nomadic. N. L. Chlenova, M. M. Pogrebova, M. Castelluccia, R. Dan lead the line of origin of Scythian pole-tops from the rattles of Iran and Transcaucasia.
The study of the technology of making bronze finds and their designs shows that they were cast on a lost wax model or in bivalve molds. In the interpretation of the function of Scythian pole-tops in the period of the 1990s—2010s the researchers depending on the context of discovery correlate these objects from burials with carts (Yu. V. Boltryk) or wooden poles that limited the ritual space for sacrifices (A. R. Kantorovich, V. R. Erlikh). H. Parzinger and S. Hasanov associate their use with shamanism.
Thus, the history of the study of Scythian pole-tops made it possible to highlight topical issues. These are the origin and function, improvement of typology using new methods, clarification of chronology, correlation of the distribution of finds with key events in history in Eastern and Central Europe during the Scythian Age.
公元前7 - 4世纪的金属杆顶是与斯基泰时代东欧和中欧部落有关的最奇特的材料之一。然而,对其功能的看法不一。杆顶有一个相当笼统的名字,只是大致反映了这些物体的用途。然而,对这些文物的研究使我们能够区分三个时期:第一个时期(1850 - 1940年代),第二个时期(1950 - 1980年代)和第三个时期(从1990年代到现在)。第一个时期(1950 - 80年代)开始于i.e. Zabelin对草原贵族墓葬的发掘。在克拉斯诺库茨基、斯洛诺夫斯卡娅·布利兹尼察、切尔托姆利克等地,人们发现了许多斯基泰人的杆顶。由于在墓葬中发现的本地化,Zabelin能够提出这些物品的功能。他认为杆顶可能是大车的装饰,也就是战车上的游牧帐篷。这一时期与A. S. Lappo-Danilevsky、E. Minns、I. I. Tolstoy和N. P. Kondakov、J. Hampel、P. Reinicke、L. Marton等人的作品有关。这一结果在罗斯托夫的研究中得到了总结。他支持殡葬车的观点,并将这些发现的起源与赫梯和亚述艺术、外高加索坟墓联系起来。在第二个时期(1950 - 80年代),对斯基泰人的杆顶、人工制品的系统化和研究新方法的使用进行了显著的研究。当时提出的类型学至今仍在研究中使用。在70年代末,几乎所有已知的发现都在e.v. Perevodchikova的论文中被系统化。为了解释杆顶的意义,人们使用了不同的方法:作为战车拉杆的一部分(V. V. Shleev),萨满乐器(K. Bakai),作为标志仪式空间的世界树概念的体现(E. V. Perevodchikova, D. S. Raevsky)。V. A.伊利斯卡娅认为这些文物是多功能的。T. B. Bartseva对金属化学成分的研究很重要,因为它证明了几个生产中心的存在,并揭示了这些发现的起源。在第三个时期(从20世纪90年代到现在),澄清了斯基泰杆顶的功能目的和起源问题。学者们认为它们是标志着斯基泰人到达北高加索和北本蒂克地区的指标(V. I. Klochko, V. Yu。Murzin, A. Yu。Alekseev, s.a. Skory, d.s. Grechko)。T. V. Ryabkova将球形极点的起源与东部地区联系起来,认为这些发现纯粹是游牧地区。N. L. Chlenova, M. M. Pogrebova, M. Castelluccia, R. Dan领导了来自伊朗和外高加索的摇尾器的斯基泰人极顶的起源路线。对青铜器制造技术及其设计的研究表明,它们是在一个丢失的蜡模型或双壳模具上铸造的。在解释20世纪90年代至2010年代期间斯基泰人杆顶的功能时,研究人员根据发现的背景将这些来自埋葬的物体与手推车联系起来(Yu。V. Boltryk)或限制祭祀仪式空间的木杆(A. R. Kantorovich, V. R. Erlikh)。帕辛格(H. Parzinger)和哈萨诺夫(S. Hasanov)将它们的使用与萨满教联系起来。因此,研究斯基泰杆顶的历史使得突出热点问题成为可能。这些是起源和功能,使用新方法改进类型学,澄清年表,发现分布与斯基泰时代东欧和中欧历史上关键事件的相关性。