{"title":"Causality and the Secrets of Extraordinary Events in the Philosophy of Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna)","authors":"Sümeyye Bayır Taşdemir","doi":"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.2.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to discuss Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna)'s claim that extraordinary events can also be explained by nature, as opposed to a world of meaning inherited from Aristotle and based on sensible qualities and the tradition that excludes events that take place in this world but cannot be explained by nature. In this direction, the secrets of causality and extraordinary states in the philosophy of Avicenna were examined separately. Our study, which is shaped by the text analysis method, focuses on the works of Avicenna and secondary academic studies written about Avicenna. The relationship of the events that are thought to have no place in nature, called extraordinary events, with nature has been evaluated. In this context, the paper consists of two parts and an evaluation part. In the first part, causality, and nature in the philosophy of Avicenna, in the second part, the secrets of extraordinary events in the philosophy of Avicenna, and in the last part, an evaluation of the rational explanations presented by the philosophy of Avicenna to scientific reality in the light of these explanations. In the research, the causality section in the philosophy of Avicenna is explained based on the Physics and Metaphysics works. In addition, secondary sources were also used. The relationship between nature and the context of extraordinary events is shaped by the claims of Ibn Sīnā in his work al-Isharat wa’l-tanbihat. In the work, Avicenna examines this subject under a specific title. The claim that extraordinary events can be explained in the context of natural causation is also emphasized in this section. However, considering the terms that Ibn Sīnā used to explain extraordinary events and the chapter he included in his work, different results are obtained from his claim. Ibn Sīnā emphasizes that it is one of the known ways of nature that even the savant can stay hungry for a long time. It is claimed that the subject proceeds through the wise and that every situation has a natural way. Based on this, it is thought that the research will contribute to the interpretations of whether Avicenna is a mystical or rational philosopher. As a result of the research, although Ibn Sīnā states that he explained extraordinary events with reason, it is seen that he also bears traces of a mystical understanding. While the parts of Ibn Sīnā's works in which he examines explicitly the issue of causality are shaped by existence, explanations are made according to the characteristics of the soul in extraordinary events. He uses the relationship between soul and body to explain extraordinary events. It is thought that the extraordinary events we deal with concerning causality should be handled and examined in different subjects such as revelation, prophecy, miracle, and dream.","PeriodicalId":286866,"journal":{"name":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.2.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to discuss Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna)'s claim that extraordinary events can also be explained by nature, as opposed to a world of meaning inherited from Aristotle and based on sensible qualities and the tradition that excludes events that take place in this world but cannot be explained by nature. In this direction, the secrets of causality and extraordinary states in the philosophy of Avicenna were examined separately. Our study, which is shaped by the text analysis method, focuses on the works of Avicenna and secondary academic studies written about Avicenna. The relationship of the events that are thought to have no place in nature, called extraordinary events, with nature has been evaluated. In this context, the paper consists of two parts and an evaluation part. In the first part, causality, and nature in the philosophy of Avicenna, in the second part, the secrets of extraordinary events in the philosophy of Avicenna, and in the last part, an evaluation of the rational explanations presented by the philosophy of Avicenna to scientific reality in the light of these explanations. In the research, the causality section in the philosophy of Avicenna is explained based on the Physics and Metaphysics works. In addition, secondary sources were also used. The relationship between nature and the context of extraordinary events is shaped by the claims of Ibn Sīnā in his work al-Isharat wa’l-tanbihat. In the work, Avicenna examines this subject under a specific title. The claim that extraordinary events can be explained in the context of natural causation is also emphasized in this section. However, considering the terms that Ibn Sīnā used to explain extraordinary events and the chapter he included in his work, different results are obtained from his claim. Ibn Sīnā emphasizes that it is one of the known ways of nature that even the savant can stay hungry for a long time. It is claimed that the subject proceeds through the wise and that every situation has a natural way. Based on this, it is thought that the research will contribute to the interpretations of whether Avicenna is a mystical or rational philosopher. As a result of the research, although Ibn Sīnā states that he explained extraordinary events with reason, it is seen that he also bears traces of a mystical understanding. While the parts of Ibn Sīnā's works in which he examines explicitly the issue of causality are shaped by existence, explanations are made according to the characteristics of the soul in extraordinary events. He uses the relationship between soul and body to explain extraordinary events. It is thought that the extraordinary events we deal with concerning causality should be handled and examined in different subjects such as revelation, prophecy, miracle, and dream.
本文旨在讨论伊本·萨尼(阿维森纳)的主张,即不寻常的事件也可以用自然来解释,而不是一个从亚里士多德那里继承来的意义世界,它基于感性的品质和传统,排除了在这个世界上发生的事件,但不能用自然来解释。在这个方向上,分别考察了阿维森纳哲学中的因果关系和异常状态的秘密。我们的研究采用文本分析法,重点关注阿维森纳的著作和关于阿维森纳的二手学术研究。那些被认为在自然界中不存在的事件(称为特殊事件)与自然的关系已经得到了评估。在此背景下,本文分为两个部分和一个评价部分。在第一部分中,阿维森纳哲学中的因果关系和自然,在第二部分中,阿维森纳哲学中异常事件的秘密,在最后一部分中,根据这些解释对阿维森纳哲学对科学现实的理性解释进行评估。本研究以《物理学》和《形而上学》著作为基础,对阿维森纳哲学中的因果关系部分进行了阐释。此外,还使用了第二手资料。伊本·桑努伊在他的著作《al-Isharat wa 'l-tanbihat》中提出了自然与特殊事件背景之间的关系。在作品中,阿维森纳在一个特定的标题下审视了这个主题。特别事件可以在自然因果关系的背景下解释的主张也在本节中强调。然而,考虑到伊本·桑努伊用来解释特殊事件的术语和他在他的作品中所包含的章节,从他的主张中得到了不同的结果。伊本·桑努伊强调,即使是学者也能长时间保持饥饿,这是已知的自然规律之一。它声称,主体通过智慧进行,每一种情况都有自然的方式。在此基础上,人们认为该研究将有助于解释阿维森纳是神秘主义哲学家还是理性哲学家。作为研究的结果,尽管伊本·萨努伊说他用理性解释了非凡的事件,但可以看出,他也有神秘理解的痕迹。而部分伊本的作品,其中他明确考察了因果关系的问题是由存在塑造的,解释是根据灵魂的特点,在非同寻常的事件。他用灵魂和肉体之间的关系来解释特殊事件。人们认为,我们处理的关于因果关系的特殊事件应该在不同的主题中处理和研究,如启示、预言、奇迹和梦。