Transition to the Online Education in the Content of Pandemic: Initial Outcomes

V. Radaev
{"title":"Transition to the Online Education in the Content of Pandemic: Initial Outcomes","authors":"V. Radaev","doi":"10.15826/umpa.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is aimed at reviewing the first outcomes of the forced transition to the online higher education within two years of COVID-19 pandemic. The study focuses on advantages and disadvantages of the online education as perceived by the main stakeholders of the education process. The author summarizes the results of the large-scale sociological surveys of teachers and students of the Russian universities. These surveys were conducted by the HSE University, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow State University, and RUDN University. New unpublished data from an HSE University Monitoring of Teachers’ and Researchers’ Life conducted in December 2021 is also attracted. The author examines contradictory views of teachers and students regarding the distant learning. Special attention is paid to the opportunities and shortages of the online education, comparative quality of distant learning and psychological conditions of students. Finally, general conclusions are made with regard to the increasing de-subjectivation of relationships in the teaching process and prospects for the distant learning after the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":310472,"journal":{"name":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The paper is aimed at reviewing the first outcomes of the forced transition to the online higher education within two years of COVID-19 pandemic. The study focuses on advantages and disadvantages of the online education as perceived by the main stakeholders of the education process. The author summarizes the results of the large-scale sociological surveys of teachers and students of the Russian universities. These surveys were conducted by the HSE University, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow State University, and RUDN University. New unpublished data from an HSE University Monitoring of Teachers’ and Researchers’ Life conducted in December 2021 is also attracted. The author examines contradictory views of teachers and students regarding the distant learning. Special attention is paid to the opportunities and shortages of the online education, comparative quality of distant learning and psychological conditions of students. Finally, general conclusions are made with regard to the increasing de-subjectivation of relationships in the teaching process and prospects for the distant learning after the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向流行病内容的在线教育过渡:初步成果
本文旨在回顾新冠肺炎大流行两年内强制向在线高等教育过渡的首批成果。本研究的重点是教育过程中主要利益相关者所认为的在线教育的优点和缺点。作者总结了对俄罗斯高校师生进行的大规模社会学调查的结果。这些调查是由HSE大学、俄罗斯国民经济和公共管理总统学院、莫斯科国立大学和俄罗斯人民政治广播电视大学共同进行的。还吸引了2021年12月进行的HSE大学教师和研究人员生活监测的新未发表数据。作者考察了教师和学生关于远程学习的矛盾观点。特别关注在线教育的机会和不足,远程学习的相对质量和学生的心理状况。最后,就教学过程中关系的日益去主体化以及疫情后远程学习的前景作出了一般性结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development Features of Informal Educational Campus Spaces Labor Involvement of Employees of Higher Education Institutions: Based on Corporate Projects Centres for Teaching and Learning of the World’s Leading Universities: Best Practices Review Ecosystem-Type Universities’ Formation Dialectics and Its Influence Over Future Specialists Critical Review of the University Management Practices Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1