Benchmarking Audit Committee Effectiveness in the UK

J. Song, Brian Windram
{"title":"Benchmarking Audit Committee Effectiveness in the UK","authors":"J. Song, Brian Windram","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.249865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper adopts the benchmarking approach to study audit committee effectiveness in the UK. Using FRRP sample spanning a decade from 1990 to 2000, this paper investigates factors leading to the violation of accounting and financial reporting standards by UK firms. Our binary logit regression suggest the following results: First, smaller boards provide better incentive for monitoring; Second, consistent with previous studies, board and committee independence enhances reduce the likelihood of financial reporting problems; Third, contrary to popular suggestions, director share ownership might cause non-compliance with standards; Forth, outside directorships seem to enable non-executive directors to gain monitoring experience more quickly and is conductive to better financial reporting; Fifth, financial literacy and audit committee meeting frequency all reduce the probability of standard violations in financial reporting.","PeriodicalId":415084,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.249865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper adopts the benchmarking approach to study audit committee effectiveness in the UK. Using FRRP sample spanning a decade from 1990 to 2000, this paper investigates factors leading to the violation of accounting and financial reporting standards by UK firms. Our binary logit regression suggest the following results: First, smaller boards provide better incentive for monitoring; Second, consistent with previous studies, board and committee independence enhances reduce the likelihood of financial reporting problems; Third, contrary to popular suggestions, director share ownership might cause non-compliance with standards; Forth, outside directorships seem to enable non-executive directors to gain monitoring experience more quickly and is conductive to better financial reporting; Fifth, financial literacy and audit committee meeting frequency all reduce the probability of standard violations in financial reporting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对标审计委员会在英国的有效性
本文采用对标方法研究英国审计委员会的有效性。本文使用FRRP样本跨越1990年至2000年的十年,调查导致英国公司违反会计和财务报告准则的因素。我们的二元逻辑回归表明:首先,较小的董事会提供了更好的监督激励;第二,与之前的研究一致,董事会和委员会的独立性增强降低了财务报告问题的可能性;第三,与普遍观点相反,董事持股可能导致不符合标准;第四,外部董事似乎使非执行董事能够更快地获得监督经验,并有助于改善财务报告;第五,财务素养和审计委员会会议频率都降低了财务报告中违反准则的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Sharing of Control as a Corporate Governance Mechanism Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments What Really Matters in Auction Design Law, Property Rights and Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1