Emergency Management and Underserved Communities: Using Big Data to Improve Emergency Management Preparedness, Response and Resilience

Zachery Key, Andrea Parrish, Conner Snavely, M. Shafiee-Jood
{"title":"Emergency Management and Underserved Communities: Using Big Data to Improve Emergency Management Preparedness, Response and Resilience","authors":"Zachery Key, Andrea Parrish, Conner Snavely, M. Shafiee-Jood","doi":"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In anticipation of high impact weather events such as hurricanes, wildfires, and flash floods, public officials need to make life saving and time sensitive decisions under uncertainty. For example, when a hurricane is forming in the Atlantic, public officials need to decide whether and when to issue an evacuation order. However, there is always a large risk in issuing an order early because of the uncertain nature of weather forecasting. Besides the preparation costs, the public could lose trust in officials and forecast information. Previous studies have identified a number of sociodemographic factors contributing to individuals’ likelihood to evacuate. These research efforts have proven that the probability of evacuation shares a strong positive correlation with both economic and physical mobility, meaning older populations, low-income populations or those with larger families are less likely to evacuate. While these efforts have provided policy makers with valuable insight to provide for these low evacuation populations, there has been very little analysis of the impact of evacuation orders on constituents’ evacuation mobility patterns. To bridge the gap in literature, we investigate the relationship between evacuation policy and observed evacuation patterns during Hurricane Florence (2018). Specifically, we evaluate the evacuation index at the census block group level of communities in Virginia encountering a false positive compared to those in South Carolina experiencing a true positive. By overlaying evacuation order data with cellular mobility data and forecast information from the National Hurricane Center, we aim to capture interactions between policy measures and socioeconomic factors to assess their relationship with evacuation behavior.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In anticipation of high impact weather events such as hurricanes, wildfires, and flash floods, public officials need to make life saving and time sensitive decisions under uncertainty. For example, when a hurricane is forming in the Atlantic, public officials need to decide whether and when to issue an evacuation order. However, there is always a large risk in issuing an order early because of the uncertain nature of weather forecasting. Besides the preparation costs, the public could lose trust in officials and forecast information. Previous studies have identified a number of sociodemographic factors contributing to individuals’ likelihood to evacuate. These research efforts have proven that the probability of evacuation shares a strong positive correlation with both economic and physical mobility, meaning older populations, low-income populations or those with larger families are less likely to evacuate. While these efforts have provided policy makers with valuable insight to provide for these low evacuation populations, there has been very little analysis of the impact of evacuation orders on constituents’ evacuation mobility patterns. To bridge the gap in literature, we investigate the relationship between evacuation policy and observed evacuation patterns during Hurricane Florence (2018). Specifically, we evaluate the evacuation index at the census block group level of communities in Virginia encountering a false positive compared to those in South Carolina experiencing a true positive. By overlaying evacuation order data with cellular mobility data and forecast information from the National Hurricane Center, we aim to capture interactions between policy measures and socioeconomic factors to assess their relationship with evacuation behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应急管理和服务不足社区:利用大数据改善应急管理准备、响应和复原力
为了应对飓风、野火和山洪等高影响天气事件,政府官员需要在不确定的情况下做出拯救生命和时间敏感的决策。例如,当飓风在大西洋形成时,政府官员需要决定是否以及何时发布疏散令。然而,由于天气预报的不确定性,提前发布命令总是有很大的风险。除了准备成本之外,公众可能会对官员和预报信息失去信任。先前的研究已经确定了一些影响个人撤离可能性的社会人口因素。这些研究工作已经证明,疏散的可能性与经济和身体流动性都有很强的正相关关系,这意味着老年人、低收入人群或大家庭的人不太可能撤离。虽然这些努力为政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,为这些低疏散人群提供了帮助,但很少有关于疏散令对选民疏散流动模式影响的分析。为了弥补文献上的空白,我们研究了佛罗伦萨飓风(2018)期间疏散政策与观察到的疏散模式之间的关系。具体来说,我们评估了弗吉尼亚州遭遇假阳性的社区的人口普查街区群体水平的疏散指数,与南卡罗来纳州遭遇真阳性的社区相比。通过将疏散命令数据与国家飓风中心的蜂窝移动数据和预测信息叠加,我们的目标是捕捉政策措施和社会经济因素之间的相互作用,以评估它们与疏散行为的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering Convergence Across Behavioral and Self-report Measures Evaluating Individuals' Trust in an Autonomous Golf Cart Investigating the Illicit Trade of Cultural Property with an Automated Data Pipeline Architecture Investigating Disinformation Through the Lens of Mass Media: A System Design Dynamic Coal Production Line: Plant Design and Analysis Tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1