Evolution of war. Issues of variability or invariance of Nature and Character of War

Kakhaber Chapodze
{"title":"Evolution of war. Issues of variability or invariance of Nature and Character of War","authors":"Kakhaber Chapodze","doi":"10.33674/220199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the nature and character of the war has probably been the\nsubject of research since the first organized clash between the two opposing\ngroups. My purpose in this paper is to elaborate on specific aspects\nof evolution of nature and character of war. First, based on the analysis\nof different theories of study of war and warfare, which includes\nexamination of how warfare has evolved over a long history, analyzing\nimportant issues related to evolution of war, consider different considerations\nspecifically what was and is the catalyst for changes in the character of war\nvs. unchanging nature of war. It is important to analyze the evolution of\nwarfare, regard to revolutions in military affairs and the analysis of four\ngenerations of war. Revolutions in the military affairs have analyzed the issue\nin three directions: technological development, doctrinal innovations, and\norga-nizational adaptations, which have been an essential process in light\nof developments taking place in chronological order throughout the world.\nFour Generations War Analysis is catalysts for change to understand the real\ndrivers of the generational shift. The discussion of the fourth generation\nof war leads to the important issue what we today call the dilemmas posed by\nmodern warfare, which brought war into the abstract dimension. Military\ntheorists such as Martin van Creveld, Mary Kaldor, and Max Boot, have\nanalyzed and saw the nature and character of war from a new prism, but to\nthis day abstract nature of war “fog of war” remain unexplained, unresolved\nissue for modern military theorist","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/220199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the nature and character of the war has probably been the subject of research since the first organized clash between the two opposing groups. My purpose in this paper is to elaborate on specific aspects of evolution of nature and character of war. First, based on the analysis of different theories of study of war and warfare, which includes examination of how warfare has evolved over a long history, analyzing important issues related to evolution of war, consider different considerations specifically what was and is the catalyst for changes in the character of war vs. unchanging nature of war. It is important to analyze the evolution of warfare, regard to revolutions in military affairs and the analysis of four generations of war. Revolutions in the military affairs have analyzed the issue in three directions: technological development, doctrinal innovations, and orga-nizational adaptations, which have been an essential process in light of developments taking place in chronological order throughout the world. Four Generations War Analysis is catalysts for change to understand the real drivers of the generational shift. The discussion of the fourth generation of war leads to the important issue what we today call the dilemmas posed by modern warfare, which brought war into the abstract dimension. Military theorists such as Martin van Creveld, Mary Kaldor, and Max Boot, have analyzed and saw the nature and character of war from a new prism, but to this day abstract nature of war “fog of war” remain unexplained, unresolved issue for modern military theorist
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战争的演变。战争性质和性质的可变性或不变性问题
对战争的性质和特征的研究可能从两个对立团体之间第一次有组织的冲突开始就一直是研究的主题。我写这篇文章的目的是要阐述战争的性质和性质的演变的具体方面。首先,基于对战争和战争研究的不同理论的分析,包括对战争在漫长历史中如何演变的研究,分析与战争演变有关的重要问题,考虑不同的考虑,特别是什么是战争性质变化的催化剂。战争的本质不变。分析战争的演变,考虑军事革命和四代战争的分析是重要的。军事革命从三个方面分析了这一问题:技术发展、理论创新和组织适应,鉴于世界各地按时间顺序发生的发展,这是一个必不可少的过程。《四代战争分析》是理解代际转换的真正驱动因素的催化剂。关于第四代战争的讨论引出了一个重要的问题,我们今天称之为现代战争带来的困境,它把战争带入了抽象的维度。军事理论家,如马丁·范·克雷费尔德、玛丽·卡尔多和马克斯·布特,从一个新的角度分析和观察了战争的本质和特征,但直到今天,战争的抽象本质“战争迷雾”仍然是现代军事理论家无法解释的、未解决的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NATO Regional Approaches to Missile Defense – in the Context of Black Sea Security Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive (Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 . An Assessment of Special Military Operations in Internal Security Management in Nigeria (1966-2019) Influence of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Termination on the Regional Security of Central Asia Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne, zmiany klimatyczne, wyzwania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1