Uticaj slučaja „Achmea“ na položaj intra-EU bilateralnih investicionih ugovora

Radmila Dragišić
{"title":"Uticaj slučaja „Achmea“ na položaj intra-EU bilateralnih investicionih ugovora","authors":"Radmila Dragišić","doi":"10.55836/zbornik_pip_2204a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, through the application of analytical and synthetic methods, where content analysis and comparative analysis occupy a central place, the Achme case is considered as a selected example from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The case is being considered to find out about its impact on the position of Intra-EU bilateral investment agreements and its potential to establish legal certainty in the absence of explicit provisions in European organization law governing the relationship between EU-Intra BITs and European Union law. The paper also analyzes the Agreement on the Termination of Bilateral Investment Agreements of 5 May 2020 between European Member States, which followed the Achmea case and represents the continuation of institutional action of the Union in the direction of repealing Intra-EU BITs.","PeriodicalId":421992,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova sa XXX Susreta pravnika u privredi Republike Srbije","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova sa XXX Susreta pravnika u privredi Republike Srbije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55836/zbornik_pip_2204a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, through the application of analytical and synthetic methods, where content analysis and comparative analysis occupy a central place, the Achme case is considered as a selected example from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The case is being considered to find out about its impact on the position of Intra-EU bilateral investment agreements and its potential to establish legal certainty in the absence of explicit provisions in European organization law governing the relationship between EU-Intra BITs and European Union law. The paper also analyzes the Agreement on the Termination of Bilateral Investment Agreements of 5 May 2020 between European Member States, which followed the Achmea case and represents the continuation of institutional action of the Union in the direction of repealing Intra-EU BITs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在本文中,通过运用分析和综合的方法,其中内容分析和比较分析占据了中心位置,阿赫梅案被认为是从欧盟法院的法理中挑选出来的一个例子。目前正在审议该案件,以查明其对欧盟内部双边投资协定地位的影响,以及在欧洲组织法中缺乏管理欧盟内部双边投资协定与欧盟法律之间关系的明确规定的情况下,其建立法律确定性的潜力。本文还分析了2020年5月5日欧洲成员国之间关于终止双边投资协定的协议,该协议遵循了阿赫梅亚案,代表了欧盟在废除欧盟内部双边投资协定方向上的机构行动的继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uticaj slučaja „Achmea“ na položaj intra-EU bilateralnih investicionih ugovora Neuređene pravne posledice smrti fizičkog lica kao jedinog člana i zastupnika društva s ograničenom odgovornošću Ugovor o hipoteci i založna izjava kao izvršne isprave Odgovornost pružaoca usluge sa nedostatkom na evropskom nivou i u pravu Srbije Prelazak prava i obaveza na stečajnog upravnika kao posledica otvaranja stečajnog postupka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1