Perbandingan Hasil Analisa Perhitungan Rangka Kuda-Kuda Kayu Dengan Menggunakan SAP-2000 dan Metode Titik Buhul

Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring Pub Date : 2023-02-06 DOI:10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4443

Sudarno P Tampubolon

{"title":"Perbandingan Hasil Analisa Perhitungan Rangka Kuda-Kuda Kayu Dengan Menggunakan SAP-2000 dan Metode Titik Buhul","authors":"Sudarno P Tampubolon","doi":"10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a study that discusses the comparison of the results of the analysis of the calculation of the forces on the wooden framework using the Structure Analysis Program-2000 (SAP-2000) and method of joint. The value of each force of vertical bars, horizontal bars, tensile bars, and compression members at each point of the wooden framework will be calculated on three wooden framework spans with spans of 7m, 9m, and 11m. Comparison of the results of the calculation of the value of the rod force from the two methods will be compared to see the efficiency of the calculation analysis of the two methods. From the results of the calculation of the method of joint and the Analysis of Structure Analysis Program-2000 (SAP-2000) in calculating and analyzing the value of each vertical bar force, horizontal bar, tension member, and compression member, the difference between each rod force is at (0- 0.51) kg. This shows that the calculation analysis using the Structure Analysis Program-2000 (SAP-2000) is faster and more efficient in calculating each bar force.","PeriodicalId":403309,"journal":{"name":"Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is a study that discusses the comparison of the results of the analysis of the calculation of the forces on the wooden framework using the Structure Analysis Program-2000 (SAP-2000) and method of joint. The value of each force of vertical bars, horizontal bars, tensile bars, and compression members at each point of the wooden framework will be calculated on three wooden framework spans with spans of 7m, 9m, and 11m. Comparison of the results of the calculation of the value of the rod force from the two methods will be compared to see the efficiency of the calculation analysis of the two methods. From the results of the calculation of the method of joint and the Analysis of Structure Analysis Program-2000 (SAP-2000) in calculating and analyzing the value of each vertical bar force, horizontal bar, tension member, and compression member, the difference between each rod force is at (0- 0.51) kg. This shows that the calculation analysis using the Structure Analysis Program-2000 (SAP-2000) is faster and more efficient in calculating each bar force.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

比较框架框架的计算结果，使用SAP-2000和圆点方法

本研究是利用结构分析程序-2000 (SAP-2000)和节点法对木结构框架受力计算的分析结果进行比较研究。在跨度分别为7m、9m、11m的三个木框架跨上计算木框架各点竖向筋、水平筋、受拉筋、受压构件各受力值。通过对比两种方法的杆力值计算结果，可以看出两种方法的计算分析的效率。从节理法的计算结果和结构分析程序-2000 (SAP-2000)对各竖杆力、水平杆力、受拉杆力和受压杆力的计算和分析结果来看，各杆力的差值为(0- 0.51)kg。这表明使用结构分析程序-2000 (SAP-2000)计算各杆力的速度更快，效率更高。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring

自引率

0.00%

发文量