A Foot in the Door: Field-experiments on Entrepreneurs’ Network Activation Strategies for Investor Referrals

Jared Nai, Yimin Lin, Reddi Kotha, B. Vissa
{"title":"A Foot in the Door: Field-experiments on Entrepreneurs’ Network Activation Strategies for Investor Referrals","authors":"Jared Nai, Yimin Lin, Reddi Kotha, B. Vissa","doi":"10.1002/smj.3341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research summary: We investigate entrepreneurial network activation – the processes by which entrepreneurs select specific contacts from their existing personal network and persuade the selected contacts to provide referrals to access targeted early-stage investors (venture capitalists or angel-investors). We differentiate between selection of entrepreneur-centric contacts versus investor-centric contacts. We also distinguish between persuasion tactics that induce contacts' cooperation through promises of reciprocity versus offers of monetary incentives. We conducted two field-experiments in India and one in Singapore. Our primary field-experiment involved 42 Singapore-based entrepreneurs seeking referrals from 684 network contacts to reach a panel of 4 investors. Our evidence suggests that selecting investor-centric contacts leads to greater referral success; in addition, persuasion by promising reciprocity also leads to greater referral success. Managerial summary: A vital first-step for resource-starved entrepreneurs seeking funding for their scalable business-idea is to obtain referrals to early-stage investors, since such investors pay more attention to referrals from trusted contacts. Using field-experiments, we examine how entrepreneurs’ choices in selecting network contacts and persuading them to provide referrals drive their access to investors. Results suggest that compared to the habitual pattern of requesting referrals from contacts proximate to themselves, entrepreneurs are about 6 times more likely to secure successful referrals when they select investor-centric contacts for referral requests. Further, actively persuading contacts by promising future reciprocity results in about 3 times higher likelihood of securing successful referrals. Our findings show how thoughtful activation of existing contacts can enable even modestly-connected entrepreneurs to gain investor access.","PeriodicalId":280939,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD: Entrepreneurship & Family Enterprise (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD: Entrepreneurship & Family Enterprise (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Research summary: We investigate entrepreneurial network activation – the processes by which entrepreneurs select specific contacts from their existing personal network and persuade the selected contacts to provide referrals to access targeted early-stage investors (venture capitalists or angel-investors). We differentiate between selection of entrepreneur-centric contacts versus investor-centric contacts. We also distinguish between persuasion tactics that induce contacts' cooperation through promises of reciprocity versus offers of monetary incentives. We conducted two field-experiments in India and one in Singapore. Our primary field-experiment involved 42 Singapore-based entrepreneurs seeking referrals from 684 network contacts to reach a panel of 4 investors. Our evidence suggests that selecting investor-centric contacts leads to greater referral success; in addition, persuasion by promising reciprocity also leads to greater referral success. Managerial summary: A vital first-step for resource-starved entrepreneurs seeking funding for their scalable business-idea is to obtain referrals to early-stage investors, since such investors pay more attention to referrals from trusted contacts. Using field-experiments, we examine how entrepreneurs’ choices in selecting network contacts and persuading them to provide referrals drive their access to investors. Results suggest that compared to the habitual pattern of requesting referrals from contacts proximate to themselves, entrepreneurs are about 6 times more likely to secure successful referrals when they select investor-centric contacts for referral requests. Further, actively persuading contacts by promising future reciprocity results in about 3 times higher likelihood of securing successful referrals. Our findings show how thoughtful activation of existing contacts can enable even modestly-connected entrepreneurs to gain investor access.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一步之遥:企业家引荐投资者的网络激活策略的实地实验
研究总结:我们研究了企业家网络激活——企业家从他们现有的个人网络中选择特定的联系人,并说服被选中的联系人向目标早期投资者(风险资本家或天使投资者)提供推荐的过程。我们区分选择以企业家为中心的联系人和以投资者为中心的联系人。我们还区分了说服策略,即通过承诺互惠来诱导联系人合作,而不是提供金钱激励。我们在印度进行了两次实地试验,在新加坡进行了一次。我们最初的实地实验涉及42位新加坡企业家,他们从684位网络联系人中寻求推荐,以达到一个由4位投资者组成的小组。我们的证据表明,选择以投资者为中心的联系人会导致更大的推荐成功;此外,承诺互惠的说服也会导致更大的转诊成功。管理总结:对于资源匮乏的企业家来说,为其可扩展的商业理念寻求资金的关键第一步是获得早期投资者的推荐,因为这些投资者更关注可信联系人的推荐。通过实地实验,我们研究了企业家在选择网络联系人和说服他们提供推荐方面的选择如何推动他们接触投资者。结果表明,与从自己附近的联系人请求推荐的习惯模式相比,当企业家选择以投资者为中心的联系人进行推荐请求时,他们获得成功推荐的可能性约为6倍。此外,通过承诺未来的互惠来积极说服联系人,可以使成功推荐的可能性提高约3倍。我们的研究结果表明,周到地激活现有的联系,甚至可以使关系一般的企业家获得投资者的接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Foot in the Door: Field-experiments on Entrepreneurs’ Network Activation Strategies for Investor Referrals Knowledge Mobilization in the Face of Imitation: Microfoundations of Knowledge Aggregation and Firm-Level Innovation I Won’t, Therefore I Am: Being Stubborn Does Ownership Structure Affect Firm's Performance? Empirical Evidence from Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1