History of Jirga Laws in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Do Islamic Law and Jirga Laws had the same Historical Jurisprudential Approach?

Lutfullah Saqib, Rasheed Ahmad Faizy
{"title":"History of Jirga Laws in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Do Islamic Law and Jirga Laws had the same Historical Jurisprudential Approach?","authors":"Lutfullah Saqib, Rasheed Ahmad Faizy","doi":"10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jirga, a historical legal antique has been an informal adjudication of Pakhtūns. In the present research endeavor conventional Jirga and its various facets had been critically examined from Sharī’ah perspective i.e. whether such Jirga and its procedure is based on Islamic law or not. Jarga bears a very close resemblance in terms of structure and procedure with Qad̝ā and Taḥkīm. Jirga has been simple with no binding implementation. Since 18th century and on-wards, Jirga has evolved into an informal institution of dispute resolution. The criterion for Jirga-Mārān, and Qād̝ī or Ḥākim, astonishingly, have been identical. Besides the free consent, justice dispenser (Jarga-Mār/Qād̝ī or Ḥākim) was supposed not be relative or party (himself) in the matter at all. The fuqahā, both classical and contemporary, have discussed the intermediation through Jirga. This study focuses on compliance and non-compliance of Jirga to Qad̝ā.","PeriodicalId":159824,"journal":{"name":"Al-Idah","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Idah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jirga, a historical legal antique has been an informal adjudication of Pakhtūns. In the present research endeavor conventional Jirga and its various facets had been critically examined from Sharī’ah perspective i.e. whether such Jirga and its procedure is based on Islamic law or not. Jarga bears a very close resemblance in terms of structure and procedure with Qad̝ā and Taḥkīm. Jirga has been simple with no binding implementation. Since 18th century and on-wards, Jirga has evolved into an informal institution of dispute resolution. The criterion for Jirga-Mārān, and Qād̝ī or Ḥākim, astonishingly, have been identical. Besides the free consent, justice dispenser (Jarga-Mār/Qād̝ī or Ḥākim) was supposed not be relative or party (himself) in the matter at all. The fuqahā, both classical and contemporary, have discussed the intermediation through Jirga. This study focuses on compliance and non-compliance of Jirga to Qad̝ā.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省支尔格法的历史——伊斯兰法和支尔格法是否具有相同的历史法学方法?
支尔格会议,一个历史悠久的法律古董一直是一个非正式的裁决Pakhtūns。在目前的研究努力中,传统支尔格会议及其各个方面从shari ' ah的角度进行了批判性的考察,即这种支尔格会议及其程序是否基于伊斯兰法律。Jarga在结构和程序上与Qad æ r ā和Taḥkīm非常相似。支尔格会议一直很简单,没有约束性的执行。自18世纪以来,支尔格会议已发展成为解决争端的非正式机构。令人惊讶的是,Jirga-Mārān和Qād æ r æ or Ḥākim的标准是相同的。除了自由同意之外,司法分施者(Jarga-Mār/Qād æ r æ or Ḥākim)也不应该是本案的亲属或当事人(他自己)。古典和当代的富卡哈都讨论过支尔格的调解。本研究的重点是支尔格对Qad ā r ā的遵守和不遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Academic Curriculum of Universities and Madrasas in perspective of Islam and modern era A research analysis on the Challenges of Media in the field of Da’wah A Comparative Study on Educational Ethics: Insights from Islamic Educational Philosophy and Western Literature Exploring the Global Impact of Homosexuality: A Comprehensive Analysis from Islamic Perspective الأساليب التربوية للوقاية من الفساد الأخلاقي في الإسلام.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1