Timelines Are Expressive Enough to Capture Action-Based Temporal Planning

N. Gigante, A. Montanari, M. C. Mayer, Andrea Orlandini
{"title":"Timelines Are Expressive Enough to Capture Action-Based Temporal Planning","authors":"N. Gigante, A. Montanari, M. C. Mayer, Andrea Orlandini","doi":"10.1109/TIME.2016.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planning prblems are usually expressed by specifying which actions can be performed to obtain a given goal. In temporal planning problems, actions come with a time duration and can overlap in time, which noticeably increase the complexity of the reasoning process. Action-based temporal planning has been thoroughly studied from the complexity-theoretic point of view, and it has been proved to be EXPSPACE-complete in its general formulation. Conversely, timeline-based planning problems are represented as a collection of variables whose time-varying behavior is governed by a set of temporal constraints, called synchronization rules. Timelines provide a unified framework to reason about planning and execution under uncertainty. Timeline-based systems are being successfully employed in real-world complex tasks, but, in contrast to action-based planning, little is known on their computational complexity and expressiveness. In particular, a comparison of the expressiveness of the action-and timeline-based formalisms is still missing. This paper contributes a first step in this direction by proving that timelines are expressive enough to capture action-based temporal planning, showing as a byproduct the EXPSPACE-completeness of timeline-based planning with no temporal horizon and bounded temporal relations only.","PeriodicalId":347020,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2016.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Planning prblems are usually expressed by specifying which actions can be performed to obtain a given goal. In temporal planning problems, actions come with a time duration and can overlap in time, which noticeably increase the complexity of the reasoning process. Action-based temporal planning has been thoroughly studied from the complexity-theoretic point of view, and it has been proved to be EXPSPACE-complete in its general formulation. Conversely, timeline-based planning problems are represented as a collection of variables whose time-varying behavior is governed by a set of temporal constraints, called synchronization rules. Timelines provide a unified framework to reason about planning and execution under uncertainty. Timeline-based systems are being successfully employed in real-world complex tasks, but, in contrast to action-based planning, little is known on their computational complexity and expressiveness. In particular, a comparison of the expressiveness of the action-and timeline-based formalisms is still missing. This paper contributes a first step in this direction by proving that timelines are expressive enough to capture action-based temporal planning, showing as a byproduct the EXPSPACE-completeness of timeline-based planning with no temporal horizon and bounded temporal relations only.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间线具有足够的表现力,能够捕捉到基于行动的时间计划
规划问题通常通过指定可以执行哪些操作来实现给定的目标来表示。在时间规划问题中,动作有一个持续时间,并且可以在时间上重叠,这明显增加了推理过程的复杂性。从复杂性理论的角度对基于动作的时间规划进行了深入的研究,并证明其一般表述是expspace完备的。相反,基于时间线的规划问题被表示为变量的集合,这些变量的时变行为由一组时间约束(称为同步规则)控制。时间表为不确定情况下的计划和执行提供了一个统一的框架。基于时间轴的系统正在成功地应用于现实世界的复杂任务中,但是,与基于行动的计划相比,人们对其计算复杂性和表达能力知之甚少。特别是,对行动和基于时间线的形式主义的表现力的比较仍然缺失。本文在这个方向上迈出了第一步,证明了时间轴具有足够的表现力,可以捕获基于动作的时间规划,并作为副产品展示了基于时间轴的规划的expspace完整性,没有时间视界,只有有界的时间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symbolic Simulation of Parametrized Hybrid Systems with Affine Arithmetic Modelling Systems over General Linear Time Automatic Verification, Performance Analysis, Synthesis and Optimization of Timed Systems Timelines Are Expressive Enough to Capture Action-Based Temporal Planning Optimal Control for Simple Linear Hybrid Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1