Comparison of Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Networks Without and With External Inputs for PV Output Power Prediction

Rensheng Liu, Godwin Norense Osarumwense Asemota, Sarah Benimana, Aphrodis Nduwamungu, Samuel Bimenyimana, J. De Dieu Niyonteze
{"title":"Comparison of Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Networks Without and With External Inputs for PV Output Power Prediction","authors":"Rensheng Liu, Godwin Norense Osarumwense Asemota, Sarah Benimana, Aphrodis Nduwamungu, Samuel Bimenyimana, J. De Dieu Niyonteze","doi":"10.1109/ICAIIS49377.2020.9194878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate and precise prediction of power output plays a great significance in power system industry, as it provides the basic outlooks and views for making future decisions in power system planning and operation. This paper used monthly and annual dataset of output power and solar irradiance from a stand-alone solar system to compare nonlinear autoregressive neural network (NARNET) and nonlinear autoregressive with External (Exogenous) input neural network algorithms in predicting (short term and long term prediction) the output power from photovoltaic (PV) system. During the execution of prediction, The Levenberg-Marquardt method was adopted and used for training. Comparison results reveals that NARNET and NARX neural network are both suitable for performing PV output power prediction, but NARX was found to be more accurate. NARNET best prediction result was achieved with MSE (Mean Square Errors) equal to 1.6153 and coefficient R equals to 0.47643 while for annual NARNET prediction model, the MSE and R were found to be equals to 0.84891 and 0.82244. For NARX monthly prediction model, the MSE and R were equal to 0.99206 and 0.53094 while for the case of NARX annual prediction model, the MSE and R were 0.8008 and 0.85248 respectively. The lower the MSE indicates few errors and the more R is close to unity indicates the better correlation and great relation between actual and predicted values.","PeriodicalId":416002,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems (ICAIIS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems (ICAIIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIIS49377.2020.9194878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Accurate and precise prediction of power output plays a great significance in power system industry, as it provides the basic outlooks and views for making future decisions in power system planning and operation. This paper used monthly and annual dataset of output power and solar irradiance from a stand-alone solar system to compare nonlinear autoregressive neural network (NARNET) and nonlinear autoregressive with External (Exogenous) input neural network algorithms in predicting (short term and long term prediction) the output power from photovoltaic (PV) system. During the execution of prediction, The Levenberg-Marquardt method was adopted and used for training. Comparison results reveals that NARNET and NARX neural network are both suitable for performing PV output power prediction, but NARX was found to be more accurate. NARNET best prediction result was achieved with MSE (Mean Square Errors) equal to 1.6153 and coefficient R equals to 0.47643 while for annual NARNET prediction model, the MSE and R were found to be equals to 0.84891 and 0.82244. For NARX monthly prediction model, the MSE and R were equal to 0.99206 and 0.53094 while for the case of NARX annual prediction model, the MSE and R were 0.8008 and 0.85248 respectively. The lower the MSE indicates few errors and the more R is close to unity indicates the better correlation and great relation between actual and predicted values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无外部输入和有外部输入的非线性自回归神经网络用于光伏输出功率预测的比较
准确准确的输出功率预测在电力系统工业中具有重要意义,它为电力系统规划和运行的未来决策提供了基本的展望和观点。本文利用独立太阳能系统的月度和年度输出功率和太阳辐照度数据集,比较了非线性自回归神经网络(NARNET)和非线性自回归与外部(外生)输入神经网络算法在光伏(PV)系统输出功率预测(短期和长期预测)中的应用。在预测执行过程中,采用Levenberg-Marquardt方法进行训练。对比结果表明,NARNET和NARX神经网络均适用于光伏发电输出功率预测,但NARX神经网络更准确。当MSE(均方误差)为1.6153,R系数为0.47643时,NARNET预测模型的最佳预测结果为MSE为0.84891,R为0.82244。对于NARX月度预测模型,MSE和R分别为0.99206和0.53094;对于NARX年度预测模型,MSE和R分别为0.8008和0.85248。MSE越低,误差越小,R越接近1,表明预测值与实测值相关性越好,关联度越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of a 5G Multi-band Mobile Phone Antenna Based on CRLH-TL Decision Tree Generation Method in Intrusion Detection System High-speed Railway Timetabling Model based on Transfer Optimization Integrated Guidance and Control for Homing Missiles with Terminal Angular Constraint in Three Dimension Space Research on Stator-Core Temperature Characteristics under Static Air-Gap Eccentricity in Turbo-generator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1