At the Backdoor of the Levant: Anglo-Dutch Competition in the Persian Gulf, 1623–1766

R. Matthee
{"title":"At the Backdoor of the Levant: Anglo-Dutch Competition in the Persian Gulf, 1623–1766","authors":"R. Matthee","doi":"10.1163/9789004476615_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses and assesses Dutch and English trade practices in the Persian Gulf while comparing these to their operations in the Levant trade. The author offers many interesting observations about differences and similarities. One important (and understudied) difference is the need for the Europeans to work through intermediaries, Indians, Jews and Armenians. What emerges most clearly is that the Safavid government was far more interventionist than the Ottomans. While the latter did n...","PeriodicalId":325847,"journal":{"name":"Friends and Rivals in the East","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Friends and Rivals in the East","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004476615_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses and assesses Dutch and English trade practices in the Persian Gulf while comparing these to their operations in the Levant trade. The author offers many interesting observations about differences and similarities. One important (and understudied) difference is the need for the Europeans to work through intermediaries, Indians, Jews and Armenians. What emerges most clearly is that the Safavid government was far more interventionist than the Ottomans. While the latter did n...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在黎凡特的后门:1623-1766年波斯湾的英荷竞争
本文讨论并评估了荷兰和英国在波斯湾的贸易实践,同时将这些与他们在黎凡特贸易中的操作进行了比较。作者提供了许多关于异同的有趣观察。一个重要的(但未被充分研究的)区别是,欧洲人需要通过中间人——印度人、犹太人和亚美尼亚人——来工作。最明显的是,萨法维政府比奥斯曼帝国更倾向于干预。而后者却……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trade, Politics and Strategy: The Anglo-Dutch Wars in the Levant (1645–1675) Merchants, Nations and Free-Agency: An Attempt at a Qualitative Characterization of Trade in the Eastern Mediterranean, 1620–1640 An Undiplomatic Anglo-Dutch Dispute at the Porte: The Quarrel at Edirne Between Coenraad van Heemskerck and Lord Paget (1693) At the Backdoor of the Levant: Anglo-Dutch Competition in the Persian Gulf, 1623–1766 Commercial Practices and Competition in the Levant: The British and the Dutch in Eighteenth-Century Izmir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1