THE NINTH GRADERS’ PISA-BASED READING LITERACY COMPETENCE

Iin Nur Yasinta, A. Hamsa, Usman
{"title":"THE NINTH GRADERS’ PISA-BASED READING LITERACY COMPETENCE","authors":"Iin Nur Yasinta, A. Hamsa, Usman","doi":"10.22216/curricula.v7i1.919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia's reading literacy score is below the average for 18 years as a participant in pisa assessment from 2000 to 2018. In 2018, the average reading literacy score of Indonesian students showed a significant decrease of 371. The scores obtained by Indonesian students do not meet the average minimum score of international literacy. Test sampling conducted by PISA is also one of the factors that determine the test results. Sampling is done randomly and not thoroughly so that the results do not represent the picture of literacy in a school. SMPN 5 Mandai, Maros Regency is a school that does not become a PISA test sample. Thus, measuring students' reading literacy in SMPN 5 Mandai is important to obtain specific and uniform data. The measurement results can later be used as a foundation to produce appropriate learning methods and design the right reading program for students. The present study aimed to examine: (1) students’ competence in finding text information; (2) students’ competence in understanding the text; (3) students’ competence in evaluating and reflecting on the text. A quantitative research design was used. The sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique. The data were gathered using the internationally acknowledged OECD-PISA questions. The data collection technique is carried out by providing a test for 60 minutes. Data analysis steps, namely (1) performing a score, (2) converting the score into a value, (3) creating a value matrix, (4) establishing a competency category, and (5) making conclusions. Data analysis was run in SPSS version 25. The findings revealed that: (1) students’ competence in locating text information was sufficient, with a mean score of 63.92; (2) students’ competence in comprehending a text was very poor, with a mean score of 52.55; and (3) students’ competence in evaluating and reflecting on the text was very poor, with a mean score of 45.27.","PeriodicalId":418994,"journal":{"name":"Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22216/curricula.v7i1.919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Indonesia's reading literacy score is below the average for 18 years as a participant in pisa assessment from 2000 to 2018. In 2018, the average reading literacy score of Indonesian students showed a significant decrease of 371. The scores obtained by Indonesian students do not meet the average minimum score of international literacy. Test sampling conducted by PISA is also one of the factors that determine the test results. Sampling is done randomly and not thoroughly so that the results do not represent the picture of literacy in a school. SMPN 5 Mandai, Maros Regency is a school that does not become a PISA test sample. Thus, measuring students' reading literacy in SMPN 5 Mandai is important to obtain specific and uniform data. The measurement results can later be used as a foundation to produce appropriate learning methods and design the right reading program for students. The present study aimed to examine: (1) students’ competence in finding text information; (2) students’ competence in understanding the text; (3) students’ competence in evaluating and reflecting on the text. A quantitative research design was used. The sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique. The data were gathered using the internationally acknowledged OECD-PISA questions. The data collection technique is carried out by providing a test for 60 minutes. Data analysis steps, namely (1) performing a score, (2) converting the score into a value, (3) creating a value matrix, (4) establishing a competency category, and (5) making conclusions. Data analysis was run in SPSS version 25. The findings revealed that: (1) students’ competence in locating text information was sufficient, with a mean score of 63.92; (2) students’ competence in comprehending a text was very poor, with a mean score of 52.55; and (3) students’ competence in evaluating and reflecting on the text was very poor, with a mean score of 45.27.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
九年级学生基于pisa的阅读读写能力
在2000年至2018年的国际学生评估中,印度尼西亚的阅读能力得分低于18年来的平均水平。2018年,印尼学生的平均阅读能力得分明显下降了371分。印尼学生获得的分数不符合国际读写能力的平均最低分数。PISA进行的测试抽样也是决定测试结果的因素之一。抽样是随机的,不彻底的,因此结果不能代表学校的文化状况。SMPN 5 Mandai, Maros Regency是一所没有成为PISA测试样本的学校。因此,测量学生的阅读素养在SMPN 5 Mandai是重要的,以获得具体和统一的数据。测量结果可以作为制定适合学生的学习方法和设计适合学生的阅读计划的基础。本研究旨在考察:(1)学生查找文本信息的能力;(2)学生理解文本的能力;(3)学生评价和反思文本的能力。采用定量研究设计。使用简单的随机抽样技术选择样本。数据是使用国际公认的OECD-PISA问题收集的。数据收集技术是通过提供60分钟的测试来进行的。数据分析步骤,即(1)执行分数,(2)将分数转化为值,(3)创建值矩阵,(4)建立能力类别,(5)得出结论。数据分析采用SPSS 25软件。结果表明:(1)学生文本信息定位能力较好,平均得分为63.92分;(2)学生对课文的理解能力较差,平均分为52.55分;(3)学生对课文的评价和反思能力较差,平均分为45.27分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LOCAL LANGUAGE AS REPRESENTATION OF LOCAL WISDOM IN THE WEST SUMATRA REGIONAL REGULATION PHYSICAL EDUCATION LEARNING MODEL BASED ON TEAM PLAY TOURNAMENTS TO BUILD STUDENT PERFORMANCE CHARACTER IMPROVING STUDENTS' LANGUAGE SKILLS THROUGH GROUP LEARNING BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION: MUHAMMAD NATSIR'S THOUGHT ON THE QUALITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WHAT MAKES PEOPLE BIND TOGETHER?’: SOCIAL COHESION FACTORS IN THE PEOPLE OF PEKANBARU TOWARDS MADANI CIVILIZATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1