Metacognitive Beliefs, Emerging Adulthood Identity, and Mediating Role of Mental Health: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Camelia Sadati, H. Namvar, Bita Nasrolahi
{"title":"Metacognitive Beliefs, Emerging Adulthood Identity, and Mediating Role of Mental Health: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach","authors":"Camelia Sadati, H. Namvar, Bita Nasrolahi","doi":"10.32598/cjhr.7.3.425.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The mental health of young people is highly influenced by the identity exploration processes, social origin of identity, and information processing styles. Objectives: The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of metacognitive beliefs on dimensions of emerging adulthood (EA) identity mediated by mental health in university students. Materials & Methods: In this descriptive correlational study, the statistical population included all male and female, 18-25-year-old university students of the public universities of Tehran in 2020-21. The study sample consisted of 178 students selected through convenience sampling. The research instruments included Arnett's Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA), Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), and Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: Metacognitive beliefs was directly associated with mental health (β=0.61, P=0.001) and instability/negativity (β=0.24, P=0.010). Moreover, mental health had a significant positive association with instability/negativity (β=0.25, P=0.004) and a significant inverse association with possibilities/optimism (β=-0.23, P=0.018). The relationship between metacognitive belief with instability/negativity and possibilities/optimism was partly mediated by mental health. Conclusion: It is necessary to pay special attention to metacognitive beliefs as a factor affecting some EA dimensions such as instability/negativity and possibilities/optimism. Mental health should also be considered as the mediator in the association relationship between metacognitive beliefs and EA dimensions. Based on the results of the present study, it is recommended to hold training workshops on metacognitive strategies to improve their mental health and form identity styles.","PeriodicalId":112656,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Health Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/cjhr.7.3.425.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The mental health of young people is highly influenced by the identity exploration processes, social origin of identity, and information processing styles. Objectives: The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of metacognitive beliefs on dimensions of emerging adulthood (EA) identity mediated by mental health in university students. Materials & Methods: In this descriptive correlational study, the statistical population included all male and female, 18-25-year-old university students of the public universities of Tehran in 2020-21. The study sample consisted of 178 students selected through convenience sampling. The research instruments included Arnett's Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA), Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), and Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: Metacognitive beliefs was directly associated with mental health (β=0.61, P=0.001) and instability/negativity (β=0.24, P=0.010). Moreover, mental health had a significant positive association with instability/negativity (β=0.25, P=0.004) and a significant inverse association with possibilities/optimism (β=-0.23, P=0.018). The relationship between metacognitive belief with instability/negativity and possibilities/optimism was partly mediated by mental health. Conclusion: It is necessary to pay special attention to metacognitive beliefs as a factor affecting some EA dimensions such as instability/negativity and possibilities/optimism. Mental health should also be considered as the mediator in the association relationship between metacognitive beliefs and EA dimensions. Based on the results of the present study, it is recommended to hold training workshops on metacognitive strategies to improve their mental health and form identity styles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知信念、新生成人身份与心理健康的中介作用:结构方程模型方法
背景:青少年的心理健康受到身份探索过程、身份的社会来源和信息处理方式的高度影响。目的:本研究旨在探讨元认知信念对大学生心理健康介导的初成年认同维度的影响。材料与方法:在本描述性相关研究中,统计人群包括2020-21年度德黑兰公立大学18-25岁的所有男女大学生。本研究样本采用方便抽样法抽取178名学生。研究工具包括Arnett初成期量表(IDEA)、元认知问卷-30 (MCQ-30)和Goldberg一般健康问卷-12 (GHQ-12)。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对数据进行分析。结果:元认知信念与心理健康(β=0.61, P=0.001)和不稳定/负性(β=0.24, P=0.010)直接相关。此外,心理健康与不稳定/消极情绪呈显著正相关(β=0.25, P=0.004),与可能性/乐观情绪呈显著负相关(β=-0.23, P=0.018)。不稳定/消极元认知信念与可能性/乐观元认知信念的关系在一定程度上受心理健康因素的中介作用。结论:元认知信念是影响EA不稳定性/消极性、可能性/乐观性等维度的重要因素,应引起重视。在元认知信念与EA维度的关联关系中,心理健康也应被视为中介因素。根据本研究结果,建议举办元认知策略培训工作坊,以改善他们的心理健康,形成认同风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How we can improve oral health education in patients with maxillofacial problems? Rejection, Current Suffering in the Lives of People with HIV/AIDS: A Qualitative Study in Iran Theory of Mind, Emotion Recognition and Social Cognition in Adolescents with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Healthy Controls Association between hypothyroidism and constipation: A cross- sectional study from the PERSIAN Guilan cohort study The introduction and establishment of dengue disease in a new area: a mini review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1