Adaptive Error Prediction for Production Lines with Unknown Dependencies

S. Soller, M. Kranz, Gerold Hölzl
{"title":"Adaptive Error Prediction for Production Lines with Unknown Dependencies","authors":"S. Soller, M. Kranz, Gerold Hölzl","doi":"10.1145/3405962.3405994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forecasting or predicting errors can dramatically reduce the downtime of machines in industrial settings and even allow to take counteractions long before the error affects the production system. A forecast system to predict upcoming critical values for identical production lines under different environmental circumstances is proposed. We focus on errors that result in multiple erroneous work pieces. These error patterns need manual corrections by a machine controller. An analysis of the system observed gathered the information about the types of errors that are observable. 30% of errors are measurement errors or single faulty work-pieces which are not influenced by previous work-pieces and do not show any indication to preceding work-pieces. These errors do not need any type of action by the machine controller. 70% of the observed errors are continuous system deviations which lead to multiple erroneous work-pieces in order or a high percentage of erroneous work-pieces in an observed time frame. We observe multiple production lines which consist of identical machines and produce the same product type. For the forecast of errors, we use the ARIMA, Holt and Holt-Winter method. Each production line and product type combination showed different results for the different forecast methods. We implemented a dynamic system that automatically detects the seasonality and trend of the specific combination to assign a correct forecast method and model. For 40 combinations of production line and product type the holt-winter algorithm performed best for 14, the holt-winter without seasonal or trend component performed best for 13 combinations and the holt-winter with only a trend component performed best for 10 setups. 3 combinations did not have a distinct best method for all observed results. By selecting the correct forecast methods, we were able to boost the forecast accuracy for the overall system over each single forecast method.","PeriodicalId":247414,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3405962.3405994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Forecasting or predicting errors can dramatically reduce the downtime of machines in industrial settings and even allow to take counteractions long before the error affects the production system. A forecast system to predict upcoming critical values for identical production lines under different environmental circumstances is proposed. We focus on errors that result in multiple erroneous work pieces. These error patterns need manual corrections by a machine controller. An analysis of the system observed gathered the information about the types of errors that are observable. 30% of errors are measurement errors or single faulty work-pieces which are not influenced by previous work-pieces and do not show any indication to preceding work-pieces. These errors do not need any type of action by the machine controller. 70% of the observed errors are continuous system deviations which lead to multiple erroneous work-pieces in order or a high percentage of erroneous work-pieces in an observed time frame. We observe multiple production lines which consist of identical machines and produce the same product type. For the forecast of errors, we use the ARIMA, Holt and Holt-Winter method. Each production line and product type combination showed different results for the different forecast methods. We implemented a dynamic system that automatically detects the seasonality and trend of the specific combination to assign a correct forecast method and model. For 40 combinations of production line and product type the holt-winter algorithm performed best for 14, the holt-winter without seasonal or trend component performed best for 13 combinations and the holt-winter with only a trend component performed best for 10 setups. 3 combinations did not have a distinct best method for all observed results. By selecting the correct forecast methods, we were able to boost the forecast accuracy for the overall system over each single forecast method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未知依赖关系生产线的自适应误差预测
预测或预测错误可以大大减少工业环境中机器的停机时间,甚至可以在错误影响生产系统之前采取对策。提出了一种预测同一生产线在不同环境下即将到来的临界值的预测系统。我们关注导致多个错误工件的错误。这些错误模式需要由机器控制器手动修正。对观察到的系统进行分析,收集有关可观察到的错误类型的信息。30%的误差是测量误差或单个故障工件,不受先前工件的影响,也不显示任何先前工件的指示。这些错误不需要机器控制器的任何动作。观察到的误差中有70%是连续的系统偏差,导致多个错误工件按顺序排列或在观察到的时间框架内错误工件的百分比很高。我们观察到多条生产线由相同的机器组成,生产相同的产品类型。对于误差的预测,我们使用了ARIMA、Holt和Holt- winter方法。不同的预测方法对不同生产线和产品类型组合的预测结果不同。我们实施了一个动态系统,可以自动检测特定组合的季节性和趋势,以分配正确的预测方法和模型。对于生产线和产品类型的40种组合,冬至算法在14种组合中表现最佳,不含季节或趋势成分的冬至算法在13种组合中表现最佳,仅含趋势成分的冬至算法在10种组合中表现最佳。3种组合对所有观察结果没有明显的最佳方法。通过选择正确的预测方法,我们能够提高整个系统的预测精度,而不是每个单一的预测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Splitting the Web Analytics Atom: From Page Metrics and KPIs to Sub-Page Metrics and KPIs SciPuRe BREXIT Election: Forecasting a Conservative Party Victory through the Pound using ARIMA and Facebook's Prophet Concept Drift Detection on Data Stream for Revising DBSCAN Cluster Adaptive Error Prediction for Production Lines with Unknown Dependencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1