Study on the Effect Path of Different Equity Backgrounds on the Volume of Transaction of P2P

Lulu Li
{"title":"Study on the Effect Path of Different Equity Backgrounds on the Volume of Transaction of P2P","authors":"Lulu Li","doi":"10.2991/ICFIED-19.2019.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses 403 P2P platforms’ data from January 2014 to June 2018 in China, and uses the mediation effect model to analyze according to the different equity background. It is found that the P2P platform can increase volume of transaction in the case of venture capital, state-owned enterprises, listed companies, and banks, and it acts through two paths. On the one hand, in the case of venture capital, state-owned enterprises, listed companies, and banks, the credit level of the platform has been implicitly guaranteed, which has led to an increase in the number of investors and borrowers. This intermediary effect has increased the volume of transaction of the platform; On the other hand, under the above circumstances, the platform's technical level, financial strength and other comprehensive operational capabilities are higher, directly increasing the volume of transaction. Through data analysis, the equity background of this platform has a greater impact on investors. There are also differences in the impact of different equity backgrounds on platform volume of transaction.","PeriodicalId":402406,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2019)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICFIED-19.2019.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper uses 403 P2P platforms’ data from January 2014 to June 2018 in China, and uses the mediation effect model to analyze according to the different equity background. It is found that the P2P platform can increase volume of transaction in the case of venture capital, state-owned enterprises, listed companies, and banks, and it acts through two paths. On the one hand, in the case of venture capital, state-owned enterprises, listed companies, and banks, the credit level of the platform has been implicitly guaranteed, which has led to an increase in the number of investors and borrowers. This intermediary effect has increased the volume of transaction of the platform; On the other hand, under the above circumstances, the platform's technical level, financial strength and other comprehensive operational capabilities are higher, directly increasing the volume of transaction. Through data analysis, the equity background of this platform has a greater impact on investors. There are also differences in the impact of different equity backgrounds on platform volume of transaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同股权背景对P2P交易量的影响路径研究
本文采用2014年1月至2018年6月国内403家P2P平台的数据,根据不同股权背景,采用中介效应模型进行分析。研究发现,P2P平台在风险投资、国有企业、上市公司和银行的案例中都能增加交易量,并通过两条路径发挥作用。一方面,对于创投、国企、上市公司、银行来说,平台的信用水平得到了隐性担保,导致了投资者和借款人数量的增加。这种中介效应增加了平台的交易量;另一方面,在上述情况下,平台的技术水平、资金实力等综合运营能力更高,直接增加了交易量。通过数据分析,该平台的股权背景对投资者的影响较大。不同股权背景对平台交易量的影响也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current Situation and Countermeasures of Agricultural Products E-Commerce Development in Heyuan City A Study on the Possibility of Inland Port Replacing Seaport —— A Case Study of Wuhan Port in China Research on the influence of China Nets Union Clearing Corporation on third-party non-interest payment business The Acquisition of SolarCity by Tesla:A Good Step or Not? Campus Loan Risk Prevention under the Context of "Internet +"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1