Dispute review/adjudication boards: One more alternative to court litigation

Milena Petrović
{"title":"Dispute review/adjudication boards: One more alternative to court litigation","authors":"Milena Petrović","doi":"10.5937/rkspp2002099p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dispute board is a relatively new, internationally recognised ADR method, a regular feature of international construction and infrastructure contracts. It is composed of three independent and impartial persons selected by the contracting parties. It's basic function is not only to resolve disputes among the parties, but also, if at all possible, to prevent them from happening. So, the board members help the parties avoid or overcome any disagreements or disputes that arise during the implementation of the contract. They also serve to ensure that, where differences between parties escalate into disputes, issues are resolved equitably and as expeditiously and cost-effectively as possible, so that relationships are enhanced (rather than harmed) for the future. The DBprocess is designed to be fast, cheap and well suited for construction disputes. The parties care fully pick their own panel based on integrity, knowledge of the work, and experience in dispute settlement. Dispute boards are certainly not new but experience over the last twenty years has proven them to be highly successful, relatively inexpensive and the only proactive form of ADR which promotes the avoidance of disputes.","PeriodicalId":236613,"journal":{"name":"Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/rkspp2002099p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dispute board is a relatively new, internationally recognised ADR method, a regular feature of international construction and infrastructure contracts. It is composed of three independent and impartial persons selected by the contracting parties. It's basic function is not only to resolve disputes among the parties, but also, if at all possible, to prevent them from happening. So, the board members help the parties avoid or overcome any disagreements or disputes that arise during the implementation of the contract. They also serve to ensure that, where differences between parties escalate into disputes, issues are resolved equitably and as expeditiously and cost-effectively as possible, so that relationships are enhanced (rather than harmed) for the future. The DBprocess is designed to be fast, cheap and well suited for construction disputes. The parties care fully pick their own panel based on integrity, knowledge of the work, and experience in dispute settlement. Dispute boards are certainly not new but experience over the last twenty years has proven them to be highly successful, relatively inexpensive and the only proactive form of ADR which promotes the avoidance of disputes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
争议审查/裁决委员会:法庭诉讼之外的另一个选择
争议委员会是一种相对较新的、国际公认的ADR方法,是国际建筑和基础设施合同的常规特征。它由缔约各方选出的三名独立和公正的人员组成。它的基本功能不仅是解决当事人之间的纠纷,而且如果可能的话,还要防止纠纷的发生。因此,董事会成员帮助双方避免或克服合同执行过程中出现的任何分歧或争议。它们还有助于确保在当事方之间的分歧升级为争端时,公平、迅速和尽可能具有成本效益地解决问题,以便为未来加强(而不是损害)关系。DBprocess被设计为快速、廉价且非常适合处理建筑纠纷。各方根据诚信、工作知识和争端解决经验精心挑选自己的专家组。争议委员会当然不是新事物,但过去二十年的经验证明,它们非常成功,相对便宜,是促进避免争议的唯一积极主动的ADR形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International commercial arbitration and private international law Model proceedings or procedure for solving contested legal issues: Similarities and differences Dispute review/adjudication boards: One more alternative to court litigation Right to a clean environment: Role of contracts and contract law Consumer ADR: The Albanian experience in transposing EU Directive 2013/11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1