Legal Awareness of Special Subjects as a Determinant of Their Legal Discretion

S. Sumenkov
{"title":"Legal Awareness of Special Subjects as a Determinant of Their Legal Discretion","authors":"S. Sumenkov","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.3.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the interconnection between legal awareness and legal discretion of the special subject. The author notes the particular role of that type of the special subject as a subject of law enforcement is noted. It is these subjects who exercise the powers of power of public authorities, directly applying the norms of law. The author points out some contradiction between the objectively existing diversity of social relations and the reference nature of law. In this aspect, the author pays considerable attention to the norms of a dispositive nature indicating the framework limits of the action of the law enforcement officer. This kind of a norm is initially endowed with such a quality as legal uncertainty that determines the practical significance of legal discretion. The article reveals the essence of law enforcement discretion, its role in the implementation of legal norms and individual legal regulation. The article covers the algorithms for making law enforcement decisions that are taken as a result of discretion as a special kind of thought activity of a special subject. The obvious dependence of the discretion of the law enforcement official on sense of justice of the last is emphasized. The main role is played by professional legal consciousness, consisting of various components of legal psychology and legal ideology. Practical examples prove the need for law enforcement discretion, the absence of which entails a gap in legal regulation. At the same time, the author draws the attention to the possibility of abuse of the right of both the consequence of the defective legal norms and the legal awareness of the subject of law enforcement. Attention is paid to the need for constant work both on improving legal prescriptions that allow for the possibility of law enforcement discretion and a positive impact on the legal consciousness of the subject of law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"2 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.3.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the interconnection between legal awareness and legal discretion of the special subject. The author notes the particular role of that type of the special subject as a subject of law enforcement is noted. It is these subjects who exercise the powers of power of public authorities, directly applying the norms of law. The author points out some contradiction between the objectively existing diversity of social relations and the reference nature of law. In this aspect, the author pays considerable attention to the norms of a dispositive nature indicating the framework limits of the action of the law enforcement officer. This kind of a norm is initially endowed with such a quality as legal uncertainty that determines the practical significance of legal discretion. The article reveals the essence of law enforcement discretion, its role in the implementation of legal norms and individual legal regulation. The article covers the algorithms for making law enforcement decisions that are taken as a result of discretion as a special kind of thought activity of a special subject. The obvious dependence of the discretion of the law enforcement official on sense of justice of the last is emphasized. The main role is played by professional legal consciousness, consisting of various components of legal psychology and legal ideology. Practical examples prove the need for law enforcement discretion, the absence of which entails a gap in legal regulation. At the same time, the author draws the attention to the possibility of abuse of the right of both the consequence of the defective legal norms and the legal awareness of the subject of law enforcement. Attention is paid to the need for constant work both on improving legal prescriptions that allow for the possibility of law enforcement discretion and a positive impact on the legal consciousness of the subject of law enforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊主体的法律意识是其法律自由裁量权的决定因素
本文考察了特殊主体的法律意识与法律自由裁量权之间的联系。发件人指出,这类特别主体作为执法主体的特殊作用已得到注意。正是这些主体行使公权力的权力,直接适用法律规范。客观存在的社会关系的多样性与法律的参照性之间存在着矛盾。在这方面,作者相当重视指示执法人员行动的框架限制的决定性规范。这种规范最初被赋予了法律不确定性的性质,决定了法律自由裁量权的现实意义。本文揭示了执法自由裁量权的本质及其在法律规范实施和个人法律规制中的作用。本文将执法决策的算法作为一种特殊主体的特殊思维活动进行讨论。强调了执法人员的自由裁量权对执法人员正义感的明显依赖。职业法律意识起着主要作用,它由法律心理和法律思想的各个组成部分组成。实际例子证明需要执法自由裁量权,缺乏这种自由裁量权就会导致法律法规的空白。同时,从法律规范缺失的后果和执法主体法律意识的缺失两方面指出了权利滥用的可能性。注意到需要不断努力改进法律规定,使其允许执法自由裁量权的可能性,并对执法主体的法律意识产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s SPECIALTY 12.00.15: A STATISTICAL STUDY OF SUBJECT MATTERS AND THE NUMBER OF DISSERTATIONS PRESENTED TO DEFENSE Electronic Investigation Technologies and Modern Format of Technical and Criminalistic Support for Criminal Cases Investigation ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF THE AIM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ACTIVITY AND MEANS OF ITS ACHIEVEMENT To the Issue of Business Trips in Labour Law of the Russian Federation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1