Investigating Language Use by Polarised Groups on Twitter: A Case Study of the Bushfires

Mehwish Nasim, Naeha Sharif, Pranav Bhandari, Derek Weber, Martin Wood, L. Falzon, Y. Kashima
{"title":"Investigating Language Use by Polarised Groups on Twitter: A Case Study of the Bushfires","authors":"Mehwish Nasim, Naeha Sharif, Pranav Bhandari, Derek Weber, Martin Wood, L. Falzon, Y. Kashima","doi":"10.1145/3572960.3572979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online social media platforms have become an important forum for public discourse, and have often been implicated in exacerbating polarisation in public sphere. Yet the precise mechanisms by which polarisation is driven are not fully understood. The study of linguistic style and features has been shown to be useful in exploring various aspects of online group discussions and, in turn, the processes which could contribute to polarisation. We present a case study around the hashtag #ArsonEmergency, collected from Australian Twittersphere during the unprecedented bushfires of 2019/2020. The dataset consists of two polarised groups and one unaffiliated group. We examine the linguistic style, moral language, and happiness profiles of 1786 users active during this catastrophic event. Our results suggest that polarised groups pushed ‘affective polarisation’ on Twitter while discussing the Australian Bushfires.","PeriodicalId":106265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Document Computing Symposium","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Document Computing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3572960.3572979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online social media platforms have become an important forum for public discourse, and have often been implicated in exacerbating polarisation in public sphere. Yet the precise mechanisms by which polarisation is driven are not fully understood. The study of linguistic style and features has been shown to be useful in exploring various aspects of online group discussions and, in turn, the processes which could contribute to polarisation. We present a case study around the hashtag #ArsonEmergency, collected from Australian Twittersphere during the unprecedented bushfires of 2019/2020. The dataset consists of two polarised groups and one unaffiliated group. We examine the linguistic style, moral language, and happiness profiles of 1786 users active during this catastrophic event. Our results suggest that polarised groups pushed ‘affective polarisation’ on Twitter while discussing the Australian Bushfires.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查推特上两极分化群体的语言使用:以丛林大火为例
在线社交媒体平台已成为公共话语的重要论坛,并经常与加剧公共领域的两极分化有关。然而,驱动两极分化的确切机制尚不完全清楚。语言风格和特征的研究已被证明在探索在线小组讨论的各个方面以及反过来可能导致两极分化的过程中是有用的。我们围绕#纵火案#这个标签进行了一个案例研究,该标签是在2019/2020年前所未有的森林大火期间从澳大利亚推特上收集的。该数据集由两个极化组和一个独立组组成。我们研究了1786名在这场灾难性事件中活跃的用户的语言风格、道德语言和幸福概况。我们的研究结果表明,在讨论澳大利亚森林大火时,两极分化的群体在推特上推动了“情感两极分化”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immediate-Access Indexing Using Space-Efficient Extensible Arrays Investigating Language Use by Polarised Groups on Twitter: A Case Study of the Bushfires Robustness of Neural Rankers to Typos: A Comparative Study Neural Rankers for Effective Screening Prioritisation in Medical Systematic Review Literature Search The Task: Distinguishing Tasks and Sessions in Legal Information Retrieval
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1