{"title":"Estimation of Residual Stress Levels in Fitness for Service Evaluations of Linepipe","authors":"R. Andrews, S. Slater","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Codified fitness for service methods such as API 579 or BS 7910 require consideration of residual stresses in fracture assessments, and guidance is given for upper bound residual stress distributions in common weld geometries. However, these distributions are not appropriate for some welding processes currently or historically used in the manufacture of linepipe, such as high frequency induction welding or flash butt welding. In addition, some linepipe manufacturing routes generate large plastic strains which result in high residual forming stresses, or mechanically relax residual stresses generated in earlier stages of production.\n This paper first reviews the code recommendations for the effects of plastic strains and stresses from high level pressure testing on residuals stresses. The paper then briefly describes the major methods of producing carbon steel linepipe and provides recommended residual stress levels for the seam weld and parent material of linepipe using the code recommendations. These are based on assumed uniform residual stresses combined with mechanical stress relaxation due to manufacturing steps such as cold expansion and hydrostatic testing. The recommendations are compared with measured residual stress levels from the open literature. Proposals are given for reduced residual stress levels when assessing axial cracks in carbon steel linepipe.","PeriodicalId":384066,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3B: Design and Analysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3B: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Codified fitness for service methods such as API 579 or BS 7910 require consideration of residual stresses in fracture assessments, and guidance is given for upper bound residual stress distributions in common weld geometries. However, these distributions are not appropriate for some welding processes currently or historically used in the manufacture of linepipe, such as high frequency induction welding or flash butt welding. In addition, some linepipe manufacturing routes generate large plastic strains which result in high residual forming stresses, or mechanically relax residual stresses generated in earlier stages of production.
This paper first reviews the code recommendations for the effects of plastic strains and stresses from high level pressure testing on residuals stresses. The paper then briefly describes the major methods of producing carbon steel linepipe and provides recommended residual stress levels for the seam weld and parent material of linepipe using the code recommendations. These are based on assumed uniform residual stresses combined with mechanical stress relaxation due to manufacturing steps such as cold expansion and hydrostatic testing. The recommendations are compared with measured residual stress levels from the open literature. Proposals are given for reduced residual stress levels when assessing axial cracks in carbon steel linepipe.
API 579或BS 7910等服务方法的规范适用性要求在断裂评估中考虑残余应力,并对常见焊缝几何形状的上限残余应力分布给出了指导。然而,这些分布不适用于目前或历史上用于制造管道的一些焊接工艺,例如高频感应焊或闪光对焊。此外,一些管道制造路线会产生较大的塑性应变,从而导致较高的残余成形应力,或者机械地放松在生产早期阶段产生的残余应力。本文首先回顾了高水平压力试验中塑性应变和应力对残余应力影响的规范建议。然后简要介绍了碳钢管道的主要生产方法,并根据规范建议提供了焊缝和管道母材的推荐残余应力水平。这些都是基于假设的均匀残余应力结合机械应力松弛,由于制造步骤,如冷膨胀和流体静力测试。将建议与公开文献中测量的残余应力水平进行比较。提出了降低碳钢管道轴向裂纹残余应力水平的建议。